Talk:Sugarloaf (ski resort)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: –Juliancolton | Talk 14:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. Sadly, this article does need a lot of work before it can be classified as "good":
- There's lots of unsourced information and apparent original research.
- The writing is choppy in some areas, with short start-and-stop paragraphs.
- An audit for MOS compliance is necessary.
- The references need to be formatted properly.
In light of the above issues, I'm quick-failing the GA nomination. Let me know when you've brought the article up to standard and I'll review it again. Regards –Juliancolton | Talk 14:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)