Talk:Subatlantic

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Subatlantic is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Globalise

I'm sorry, but why is this and the other Holocene Ages so Euro-centric? Does the Holocene only refer to Europe? As a reader, I am confused.

probably because the other continents are not interested in ground research, if the were, then there were no houses on top of sinkholes!

also the fauna part is a stub, its incomplete and only tells how we messed up in the last 2 ages, please expand it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.69.29.62 (talk) 11:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

==Replace unrelated Automotive Turbocharger Market Projection graphic on right at top.== 73.97.22.241 (talk) 17:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should there be a new age starting in the last few centuries.

The industrial revolution happened in the 1800s. Maybe a new age should be starting from there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.246.205 (talk) 01:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fauna

Would it be relevant that now (knowing that this started more than 2500 years ago), domestic animals exist? Because this is a unique development in the history of the fauna of the earth. If someone knows how to include this in the article, please do. --Laber□^T 19:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Age/Chron

The article List of geochronologic names lists it as a chron, rather than age, and Flandrian as the only age in Holocene so far. It is causing confusion. --User:Thenitingrewal 24 April 2018

In addition, there is confusion between/with the times given in the ICS box. b2k CANNOT be = BP! The typical (!) confusion of too many geologists. 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:B1FE:B2BD:CD:5E71 (talk) 07:49, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because the whole "subatlantic" is primarily based upon vegetation changes (starting with its recovery after the end of the glaciation), it MUST differ between regions in Europe, let alone the world. It is therefore completely unsuited to subdivide the Holocen. Seems to be too difficult to understand for geologists ...!! 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:B1FE:B2BD:CD:5E71 (talk) 08:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]