Talk:Stracciatella di bufala
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from Stracciatella was split to Stracciatella di bufala on 18 July 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Stracciatella. |
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:55, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Stracciatella di Bufala → Stracciatella di bufala – As other versions of Wikipedia. 95.250.194.126 (talk) 13:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't necessarily object to the proposal, but the stated reason is irrelevant. Other versions of Wikipedia are in languages other than English; we cannot infer English usage from them. Powers T 15:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support per WP:UE, given the total absence of English sources, as per Italian source. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support per In ictu oculi. An alternative would be to translate and call it Water buffalo stracciatella. In the mean time I’ll create the redirects. Ian Spackman (talk) 17:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.