Talk:Stonehenge Apocalypse

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

This article contains useful information, but is written in a very unprofessional style and contains unverified statements. Please fix this up-- it's got lots of good content, it just has poor presentation. Noone has this name yet (talk) 02:44, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are no unverified statements in this article. Any statement presented as fact will have a reference, however, it will take some time to locate and provide those references. All remaining statements are qualified as 'speculation' or 'alleged'.

Please do not remove references to homoerotic subtext. It is entirely accurate to state that there was a homoerotic relationship between the two characters, as the difference between homoerotic and homosexual is that one is subtextual, the other physical. Evidence of the former can easily be supplied. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.211.29.20 (talk) 03:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

^{[citation needed]} -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please stop changing the cast names. his name is Jacob Glaser. it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SteerpikeSister (talk • contribs) 13:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of bollocks

I've semi-protected this page and removed a tremendous amount of bollocks, even considering the somewhat extreme plot of this film. If anyone wants to suggest improvements, including a reasonable summary of the plot, please make any suggestions below. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 14:51, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've swapped what was there for three very generalist sentences, based on the plot summaries in reviews. Feel free to revert/modify.

Thanks that's much better. This article will be opened up for anon editing in the near future. Meanwhile, suggestions can be made on this page. Please see the policies on WP:NOR and WP:V. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lol @ ZZuzz and "removal of bollocks" - one of the best and most descriptive comments I have seen. I was looking at this in the early hours after I watched the movie yesterday and decided to look again later today for a copyedit - you have indeed removed a lot of unnecessary text and saved us a lot of work.

Well done Chaosdruid (talk) 17:43, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Info box

Seems that people did not notice the infobox edits lol - I have changed them but someone may need to put some info back in

I have also removed the "misha awesomeness" and related vandalism

Chaosdruid (talk) 22:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's been inserted since the temporary block has lifted. I have removed some other vandalism too. -- role^player 23:15, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Film Portrayal - removed

The section was part opinion piece, part plot summary. Whoever went to the effort of writing that section should direct their efforts at improving the Plot section. Mongoletsi (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]