Talk:Starr Report
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
POV
[edit]This page is absurdly biased, incomplete, and essentially advocates as an attack on the document it purports to explain. A previous commenter wrote "Wow." and I think that understates the degree of bias in this piece. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.122.116.114 (talk) 16:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Given the comments above and my personal opinion on the style of this article, I marked with POV in addition to ONESOURCE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llappall (talk • contribs) 01:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- note - this refers to comments then visible in 2016 before someone did "rm useless stuff & fmt". Cheers Markbassett (talk) 10:43, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- User:Llappall - Just added to Starr Report, the 11 points, so it’s no longer ONESOURCE and at least better by having more material that makes the prior POV a lesser factor. Tags have been removed. Just for completeness thought I should post: Was there anything else you particularly had in mind for here ? Cheers Markbassett (talk) 02:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Details Of The Report
[edit]It would be great to have some details of what the report says and the evidence it provided before attacking the accuracy of the report. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sorryasshere154 (talk • contribs) 06:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Well there a google provides some reflections, not sure what would be good to add ... I think the Starr report description would be it, any comparison that the Mueller report is not the same basis (DOJ private report vs Congressional Independent prosecutor) or style would be a discussion for the general article.
- NY Mag Intelligencer (2019) Remembering the Starr Report As We Await the Mueller Report
- CNN (1998) Explosive Starr report outlines case for impeachment
- NY Times (1998) THE STARR REPORT; Full Text of Findings Sent to Congress -- Part One of Thirteen
- NY Times (1998) The Overview Starr Finds a Case for Impeachment in Perjury, Obstruction, Tampering (5 perjury, 4 obstruction, 1 winess tampering, 1 abuse of power)
- NPR.org (1998) Starr Report Special Coverage
- Washington Post (1998) The Starr Report (text)
- History Place (The 11 Possible Grounds for Impeachment
- --- Rebuttal ---
- DL Dewey (1998) White House rebuttal
- CBS News (1998) White House Hits Back at Starr
- --- Complaints things were missed and/or that files were sealed
- Accuracy In Media (1998) More Impeachable Offenses (The Judicial Watch additional report.)
- Maybe I'll just do the 11 grounds and skip the rebuttal and complaints about what was not gone into. Cheers Markbassett (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2019 (UTC)