Talk:St Thomas' Anglican Church, North Sydney

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	St Thomas' Anglican Church, North Sydney is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Sydney Low‑importance

	Australia portal St Thomas' Anglican Church, North Sydney is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Last paragraph under "History".

The last paragraph under "History" reads: "St Thomas' has always stood as a prominent beacon of Christianity in the once quiet but now bustling North Sydney. There have been many ministers serve at St Thomas' over its 157 year history."

I think the first sentence is taken directly from the church's website. Also, I think it is not very encyclopaedic in its language, and also in its contents (for instance, who says that the church has always been a beacon of Christianity?). I suggest that it be removed, or replaced if someone can produce a more suitable form of words.

If I wanted to quibble, I'd say that the second sentence is so obvious as to be hardly worth saying – clearly if a church has been functioning for over 150 years there must have been many clergy/ministers who have served there. A list of rectors might be of interest, if one can be obtained. Meanwhile I have edited it slightly. Ondewelle (talk) 19:50, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, go ahead and make changes. 99of9 (talk) 00:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of any other comments, I have removed this paragraph. Ondewelle (talk) 07:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St Thomas' Anglican Church, North Sydney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070901035747/http://www.northsydney.nsw.gov.au/resources/documents/39_st_thomas_WalkingTour.pdf to http://www.northsydney.nsw.gov.au/resources/documents/39_st_thomas_WalkingTour.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]