Talk:St. Matthew's Anglican Church (Ottawa)

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	St. Matthew's Anglican Church (Ottawa) is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Ottawa Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottawa (assessed as Low-importance).

Excessive detail

This article is becoming overburdened with tons of unnecessary detail, especially in the gifts section. This is an encyclopedia and therefore is not meant to be a complete exposition of all possible details. For instance, who cares that Mildred Woods gave the church some white ribbons in 1930; this is ridiculous. This whole section should probably be removed. Other sections have similar detail that are not needed. I've tagged the article accordingly.-- BC _{talk to me} 22:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture section

I removed this section since after comparing several passages from this section with the source: http://www.newspapers.com/newspage/48460195/, it's obvious that most of the section has been lifted word for word from the source. Granted the OCR text is a bit difficult to decipher, but I saw enough to come to this conclusion. Perhaps the original writer who probably has complete access to this source can distill this stuff down and properly paraphrase the content. From the nature of the writing in other sections, I suspect lots of other text has also been lifted or very closely paraphrased.-- BC _{talk to me} 23:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]