Talk:Soviet cruiser Admiral Makarov (1970)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 16:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

lead is confusing. She was decommissioned because she was deteriorating, and the navy didn't have funding to repair her, right? That sentence needs clarity.

Done by linking to NATO reporting name. Kges1901 (talk) 20:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

paragraph on aerial threat. Admiral Makarov was armed with four AK-725 57 mm L/80 DP guns situated in two twin mountings Admiral Makarov was armed with four AK-725 57 mm L/80 DP guns situated in two twin mountings to protect against aerial threats.

. An engine room fire sparked by a lighted cigarette thrown into a ventilation shaft by a sailor was extinguished in three hours by emergency parties on 20 February 1988. how about On 20 February 1988, a sailor tossed a lighted cigarette into a ventilation shaft, causing an engine fire; emergency parties extinguished the fire in three hours, but the engine room....

Done, unfortunately the source did not specify how much damage. Kges1901 (talk) 20:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: