Talk:Southtowns

Southtowns was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 17, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 15, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 13th U.S. President Millard Fillmore was raised in a part of Western New York known as the Southtowns (Fillmore House pictured)?

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

New York (state): Western NY Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Southtowns/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Not performed a full check. Remember to state which country the place is.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Not fully chekced, but looks okay.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I am very concerned with the scope of the article. It presents a single section, with the encyclopedic header "details". That place is used to discuss several possible definitions of Southtowns is good, since there is no agreement as to the definition. But from then, the article becomes very lacking. The "attractions" section reads more like an entry at Wikitravel than Wikipedia. I would like to see more on the the demographics and geography of the region (to sovlve the variation in size, several values can be given). Also, what are defining aspects of this region? Since the area is group together, they must have a historic or other common deminion. I would like to see sections or subsection discussing aspects such as history, culture, economy, demographics, geography, transport and nature.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Not chekced.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I am failing the article. It fails to address most of what I expect to find in an article on a region, failing 3a. Make the article considerably longer and with a much broader scope, and then consider re-nominating. If you feel there has been an error, you can remoniate at WP:GAN, or ask for a reassessment. Arsenikk ^(talk) 09:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Southtowns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:58, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]