Talk:Social Democratic Movement

Bolivia Low‑importance

	Bolivia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoliviaWikipedia:WikiProject BoliviaTemplate:WikiProject BoliviaBolivia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Democrat Social Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of a coup.

While the crisis eventually led to an acceptance of the lawful transfer of power, the circumstances around the resignation of Morales is accepted by a significant part of analysts and media as at least an alleged coup. Ip says: Work Better yes. (talk) 02:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since phrasing on this issue is divisive, I try to word things carefully. Instead of "after the alleged coup," I'd say "after what Morales and his supporters alleged as a coup" or something to that effect. One sentence points you in a pretty clear direction while the other leaves more up for interpretation. To avoid constant edits, perhaps we can come up with a reasonable sentence structure in the talk page first. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 15:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is not just an internal allegation, and your country does show a clear pattern in regards to the political landscape of Bolivia. I would be very careful to to phrase a regime change just as a crisis without at least an impartial "alleged". And removal of my edit after I opened the discussion on this talk page is not very constructive, wouldn't you say?

https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/bolivia-has-seen-the-highest-number-of-coup-attempts-in-the-world/article29961623.ece Ip says: Work Better yes. (talk) 18:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point, I made a change which hopefully rectifies this by including the coup claims made by MAS. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 20:29, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As it stands now I'm satisfied. Ip says: Work Better yes. (talk) 22:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Far-Right sources?

currently there are three sources listed to support the far right claim: 5: A Velasquez, Alejo Vargas (9 June 2023). Las Retactones de las Fuerzas Militares y de Policia en América Latina z' (in Spanish)- Universidad Nacional de Colombia. ISBN 978-958-505-311-3. Retrieved 4 March 2024. 6: A Souverein, Jan; R, José Luis Exeni (2020)_ Nuevo mapa de actores en Bolivia: crisis, polarizacjön e incettjdumbre (2019-2020) (in Spanish). Friedrich Ebert Stiftung_ ISBN 978-9917-30-007-6. Retrieved 4 March 2024. 7: A Bringel, Breno (1 January 2020). "(2020) Bolsonaro y el fin del ciclo democråtico en Brasil" Fundaciön Rosa Luxemburgo Retrieved 4 March 2024.

The current source listed as 5 is difficult to verify. Its wording — "Movimiento Demócrata Social, un partido considerado de ultraderecha. De esta forma, las movilizaciones se apaciguaron, en parte también por dinámicas represivas del gobierno interino — actuación acorde con la ideología del partido" — appears in a Google Books snippet and constitutes the sole mention of far-right insinuations. This claim lacks further arguments or clarification as support.

The current source listed as 6 was authored primarily by an individual who frequently writes politically biased articles favoring MSD's political opponents. This raises doubts about the impartiality of their far-right classification of the party.

The current source listed as 7 does not contain any mention of Bolivia, Movimiento Demócrata Social, or MSD.

So, the far-right claim relies on a single source that casually labels the party as far-right without substantiating the claim and another source written by a very biased author.

I think it is more fair to label it as (centre-right to) right wing, like it was previously. PS: on the spanish page the same sources are used what is your opinion?~ 217.105.19.152 (talk) 00:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]