Talk:Single person

Anthropology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Big Changes, same Page

I made a lot of edits mostly around citation and editing the paragraphs. there was a lot of information that had weak or unsubstantiated claims. I rearranged, combined information that was good but wasn't grouped well. I added the film and Lit section. I wanted to make sure that the page was actually focusing on single persons and not on comparing them to married people. --Littel16 (talk) 19:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Took out the ridiculous "voluntarily single people must be asexual or disabled" line.

Legal and social distinction

The definition in the article is so false. Being single means not being married. Period. It has nothing to do with whether or not you are in a relationship. Single means not married. That is what it is legally speaking. Furthermore, the article is poorly written. SN 10 October 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.58.50.12 (talk) 00:31, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above. That was my impression when I read the article. It's OK to provide alternate usages of a term, but the lead gives a much-too-broad definition, and then the rest of the article, either implicitly or explicitly, largely uses the traditional definition (i.e., not married) or a close variant. Holy (talk) 20:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to better clarify the distinction between the legal and social definition of the term or at least state it is only referring to legal uses of the word single --69.146.148.56 (talk) 01:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Certain situations assume that a person is married; this includes laws that vary depending on the country. For example, in the United States, Social Security relies on spouses, children, and other family, until the point that a given individual is legally elderly (65 years of age or over), or if the person has a significant disability (of any age; see Social Security Disability). It is generally assumed an individual's family member(s) will inherit or replace the holder when they are deceased. Therefore, except for the elderly and the legally disabled, US Social Security is not a benefit single people can claim." Huh? Not an expert on US social security, but by the paragraph's logic, non-single people under 65/without a disability can't claim social security either, so this isn't an example of a situation where the law assumes that a person is married and the whole thing seems to be irrelevant. Furius (talk) 02:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article is badly written. The author should have said a single person is not eligible for a spouse's Social Security, and, if the person is divorced, is not eligible for the ex-spouse's Social Security unless married to that person for at least 10 years. Of course, single people get Social Security based on their earnings they made from work. I get it, and I have never been married. SN 10 October 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.58.50.12 (talk) 00:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, Furius. I'm editing that paragraph, which was unsourced and inaccurate.Infoman99 (talk) 21:14, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article used to state:

There is a legal distinction between a single person and an unmarried person. Generally, an unmarried person may have been married and now be widowed or divorced. This may be the significance of the title of the 1978 Paul Mazursky film An Unmarried Woman. In some cases, mortgage papers have had to be redrawn because the buyer was mistakenly described as "unmarried" rather than "single." (This left open the possibility that a mysterious ex-spouse might claim a part interest in the house being purchased.)

That is, an "unmarried" person is not married now whereas a "single" person has never married (and therefore is certain to have no ex-spouse). This is why many government official forms provide responses to the Marital Status question and usually explicitly state "Single (never married)" as the first option to ensure the official meaning of "single" is unambiguous.

The government official forms do not care if you are "Single (never married)" with 1 friend, with 20 friends, with 1 girlfriend, with 5 girlfriends and 4 boyfriends, with 2 cats and 3 dogs; all of that is irrelevant legally. Just like if your response is "Divorced" it is irrelevant whether you are "Divorced" but have (multiple) friends, or are dating (multiple) people, or have (multiple) pets, etc. Such family is important to the person, but not important to the government until it has legal significance.

It would probably improve the article to clarify that "single" is being used to refer to those people who have never been legally registered as having one or more spouses or domestic partners (regardless of how many people they unofficially tend to date). 176.26.200.244 (talk) 18:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Single person. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mulher solteira de igarapé-miri que queira relacionamento sério

sou um homem solteiro à procura de alguém 138.118.222.53 (talk) 18:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Estou querendo encontrar mulher solteira de igarapé-miri para ter um relacionamento sério

Sou sou sozinho e gostaria de conhecer alguém que seja solteira sozinha desimpedido que queira um relacionamento sério 138.118.222.53 (talk) 18:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]