Talk:Simyo

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Europe Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

it is IMHO not a dictionary's job to pillory anything or anybody. Blatant facts like those here presented are strong enough without emotional adjectives. On the other hand I'd appreciate more information about Simyo's business mode, depicting differences to other mobile companies. If I may be of assistance to re-formulate the paragraph in question, let me know. Azbi (talk) 10:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the whole paragraph sounds like an ad text. Feel free to change it Quickie (talk) 18:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see some link that proves that KPN is the fourth-ranking mobile telephone operator in Europe. They are not even in the top 5! Please change this incorrect information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ditsonis (talk • contribs) 14:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]