Talk:ShKAS machine gun

Firearms Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Untitled

Has no one asked themselves why a machinegun firing 950-1200 rounds per minute would have only a ten round magazine? It would be as useful as a single-shot rifle. The operator would have to change magazines after each squeeze of the trigger. Additionally, the gun was mounted inside the wings of some aircraft. Are we to believe that these guns had only ten rounds each?

72.164.60.172 07:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC) James[reply]

Or you can READ the article and follow the wikilinks. The article clearly states ShKAS was a revolver-type machine gun. - Emt147 ^Burninate! 02:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you read the text that you discuss? Then:"fed by metal disintegrating link ammunition belt". Enough? This ammunition belt (russian word sounds "lenta") is equipped with hundred of rounds. Enough? And by the way: don't forget that it fired 1800 per minute (standart version), not 1200.

Why the hell would you need that high of a rate of fire? You'd run through your entire ammo supply in a few seconds. Also, sign your posts. 71.245.76.111 (talk) 15:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, when you're in one airplane trying to shoot another airplane, a high rate of fire is desirable. Also, I'm going to sign my post, but not because you said so.--172.129.32.171 (talk) 09:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]