Talk:School bullying

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Christina3607, Edi theman, Filar002. Peer reviewers: Christina3607, Kelle065, Cuin283, Edi theman, Filar002.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

New to editing Wikipedia. Amusing but unfounded statement in existing article.

This is the first time I have attempted to edit Wikipedia. Not sure I'm doing it right.

I burst out laughing to find the following text in the article as it currently appears (April 3 2009):

"Strategies to reduce bullying within schools "The most effective and least expensive method of putting a stop to bullying is to execute the perpetrator(s). Methods include hanging, drowning, spit-roasting, and group activities like stoning. Alternatively, using a scissors to remove one of the bully's fingers after each incident can be an effective strategy. Researchers (Olweus, 1993;[13] Craig & Peplar, 1999;[14] Ross, 1998;[15] Morrison, 2002;[16] Whitted & Dupper, 2005;[17]"

I'm pretty sure spit-roasting and cutting off fingers isn't the recommendation of any of the listed researchers. Funny, absolutely--no doubt especially to targets of bullying who go to the page. But not useful or reliable information of the sort Wikipedia seeks in its articles.

ZabsterThinks (talk) 21:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

The bit about Himmler

I was quite astonished with the example of Himmler as a famous school bully. There is no relation between being a school bully and becoming a genocidal nazi like Himmler. The example seems to me hugely exagerated. I am removing it. 82.139.116.66 (talk) 12:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Well intentioned but poorly written.

While there are several good points about this article, from its tone it was written by someone either rather young or less than erudite. Words like "cussing" and "meanly" don't really belong in an encyclopedic article. I have done a few small edits, and will do more cleanup later today.--HillbillyProfane (talk) 08:04, 30 August 2010 (UTC):

Yep it is academically very flaky. Incidentally I may make "sexual bullying" a separate article User:Penbat/sexual bullying.--Penbat (talk) 08:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Verbal bullying v verbal abuse

Does anybody know the difference ?--Penbat (talk) 08:19, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Merger

I don't know what happened to the discussion, but has been proposed that Preventing bullying in the classroom be merged here into School bullying, even if Preventing bullying in the classroom is not a copy of a deleted article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Not very keen to get involved in this but it looks like a definite yes to merge most of the article into here. There is quite a lot of overlap, in some places the other article is better than the material here. The difficult part is somebody using their judgment as to which parts of this article to replace with the other and blend the two.--Penbat (talk) 09:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

the introductory sections of Preventing bullying in the classroom could be merged to school bullying, but I think the topic of prevention is big enough for this to stand as a separate subject. This means reduce the introduction of Preventing bullying in the classroom ,and expand the prevention sections, without it being a howto. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

File:School bullying laws in the United States-2.svg

Could anyone update this map? Arkansas, Connecticut and New Hampshire should be dark blue, Hawaii should be light blue, Indiana, Rhode Island and Wyoming should be yellow. See [1], [2], [3], [4]. Ron 1987 (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

I am removing the information in the legislation section about only 46 states having bullying laws. As of August 2013 all states, except Montana, now have anti bullying laws. I am also going to add information about the US implementing ant-bullying laws and how they may very. Relating to that, I will also be adding how anti-bullying advocates are concerned these new state laws aren't being adequately funded in order to actually be implemented. 4Him88 (talk) 02:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

References

Citation #2 is broken

Citation number 2 does not lead to an actual page. It needs to be replaced with a new source, or the statements in the article should be reworded in light of its absence. EriktheRed53 (talk) 23:31, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Problem

In the clip that shows typical school bullying / violence, I think is a little violent. Am I dne only one who is afraid that it might be perceived as the wiki in a way propagates happy slapping as it is known as?--109.232.72.49 (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Thus far you are, yes. Although actually I'm not sure the video clip adds much to the article anyway. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Can someone who is able to use wikipedia link to the French article?

I don't know enough about wiki editing to do it myself, unfortunately. Harcèlement scolaire links to this page, but not the other way around. Thank you. 67.191.199.51 (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done normally a bot would fix this but perhaps it is confused by the crosslinks with Bullying. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Huge issues with the lead.

The lead for this article, as it exists currently, is of exceedingly poor quality. It makes sweeping claims which, while they may be accurate, have no references of any kind to back them up. It is not written in an encyclopedic style, in fact, it reads more like an essay. It also has issues with grammar, and depending on your interpretation may have issues with synthesizing information and NPOV. 216.16.236.30 (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Cyber-bullying

I think we should remove the section on Cyber-bullying as it is not done in school, but outside. Although cyber-bullying might cause school bullying and vice-versa, cyber-bullying is not school bullying. ~~Ebe123~~ → report 00:30, 2 May 2013 (UT

Since this is a school bullying article, I would like to add to the cyber bullying section about the school's involvement with cyber bullying. According to the website stopcyberbullying.org, "When schools try and get involved by disciplining the student for cyberbullying actions that took place off-campus and outside of school hours, they are often sued for exceeding their authority and violating the student's free speech right." 4Him88 (talk)

According to Bullyingstatistics.org, Over half of adolescents and teens have been bullied online, and about the same number have engaged in cyber bullying. with these numbers being as high as they are, the cyber-bullying section deserves a little more information such as, 

what is considered cyber-bullying

• Sending mean messages or threats to a person’s email account or cell phone
• Spreading rumors online or through texts
• Posting hurtful or threatening messages on social networking sites or web pages
• Pretending to be someone else online to hurt another person
• Taking unflattering pictures of a person and spreading them through cell phones or the Internet
• Sexting, or circulating sexually suggestive pictures or messages about a person

References

Poorly written article

Whoever wrote this article used too many colloquial phrases, and terms that could be described better. This is not really suitable for an encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.213.2.61 (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Section 6 - Strategies to reduce school bullying

Section 6, “Strategies to reduce school bullying,” is misplaced. This section belongs at the end of the article. This is more of a next step process. For example, I know what school bullying is, I understand all the facts and the roles people play in school bulling, so now, how do I help prevent it or stop it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aladdinp07 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

I would like to add, "Conduct assessments in your school to determine how often bullying occurs, where it happens, how students and adults intervene, and whether your prevention efforts are working." to the list of strategies to reduce school bullying.4Him88 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 03:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

References

Short Stories in article

I believe that an encyclopedia should give clear definitions and understanding of the material. An encyclopedia should be more fact based.

By including the stories it is making the article biased.

The following sections should have the stories removed and each area should just have the clear definition of each topic: 1.6 Homophobic bullying, 3 Short-term and long-term effects, 9.1 Victims

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aladdinp07 (talk • contribs) 01:18, 4 October 2013 (UTC) 

173.197.8.254 (talk) 14:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Types vs forms of school bullying.

I believe that sections 1.4 Cyber Bullying, 1.5 Sexual Bullying, and 1.6 Homophobic Bullying are really a form of bullying more than there are types. The "Types" physical, verbal, or emotional are the three major types. Whereas Cyber, Sexual and Homophobic involve the 3 basic types of bullying. For example Homophobic bullying involves verbal and/or physical abuse, so this really needs to belongs under forms more than it does types.216.185.230.22 (talk) 01:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Aladdinp07 (talk) 23:49, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

I added "Pack-Bullying" to the types of school bullying section. 4Him88 (talk)

I'm going to add "direct" and "indirect" bullying to the types of bullying, along with the definition of each. ISBN 978-160286-1848 4Him88 (talk) 02:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

References

Restructure the layout to flow more smoothly between topics. Also enhance sections clarity.

For the Definition I would like to update it to a more current definition that is being used today. The following will stay the same. 1. Types of bullying – stay the same 1.1. Physical 1.2. Emotional 1.3. Verbal

After section 1.3 would like to add some sections with heading such as: 2. Where and when bullying happens 2.1. Description of 2.0 3. Frequency of bullying 4. The role kids play 4.1. Importance of not labeling kids 4.2. Kids involved in bullying 5. Who is at risk 5.1. Risk factors 5.1.1. Sign a child is being bullied 5.1.2. Signs a child is bullying others 5.1.3. Why don’t kids ask for help? 5.2. Effects 5.2.1. Kids who are bullied 5.2.2. Kids who bully others 5.2.3. Bystanders 5.2.4. The relationship between bullying and suicide 5.3. Prevent bullying 5.3.1. How to talk about bullying 5.3.2. Prevention at school 5.3.2.1. Assess bullying in your school 5.3.2.2. Find out what happened 5.3.2.3. Support the kids involved 5.3.2.4. Be more than a bystander Aladdinp07 (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

See WP:NOTHOWTO. Wikipedia should describe anti-bullying strategies that are detailed in independent reliable sources, but Wikipedia should not be telling people "How to talk about bullying" or what they should do "in your school". --Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:54, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Removing "Homophobic Bullying"

When tracing this information for the citation and to clarify "clarification needed", the citation does not relate to the information under the topic "Homophobic Bullying", also the information that is listed is a direct copy and paste from an article "https://sites.google.com/site/stopbullyinghi/homophobic-bullying".Aladdinp07 (talk) 17:47, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

School bullying

Hello, I'm Aladdinp07 (talk) 15:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC). I noticed that you made a change to an article, School bullying, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. Also make sure you talk about any changes in the talk section of the article before making any changes.

You're supposed to put that on the User talk: page of the editor who made the edit, not on the article Talk: page of the article itself. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Organisations

Time to include organisations dealing with School bullying.--Darrelljon (talk) 16:46, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Warning Signs of Bullying

I am going to add "continuous school absences" to the warning signs of someone that is being bullied. 4Him88 (talk) 22:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

References

Long term affects of bullying

I would like to add information that was collected from a study that the Huffington Post posted. The study was for the long term effects of bullying. This article already has information about the long term effects from bullying for the victim, but this study also has long term effect for the bully. I feel that to keep this article neutral and strictly informative on this topic, then it should definitely inform about all sides. I will be adding, "Pure bullies did not show problems with emotional functioning as adults. But they did show increased risk of developing antisocial personality disorder. People with this disorder have little empathy and few scruples about manipulating others for their own gain. The disorder is linked with a greater risk of becoming a criminal. Most bullies did not go on to have the disorder, Copeland said, but they were more likely to develop it than other groups." 4Him88 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 01:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I would like to add the short term effects for bystanders that witness bullying. "Witnessing bullying incidents can produce feelings of anger, fear, guilt, and sadness in observers. Bystanders who witness repeated victimization of peers can experience negative effects similar to the victimized children themselves." 4Him88 (talk) 02:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 4Him88 (talk • contribs) 02:05, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I think you mean you already added these things, not that you would like to. Many thanks for your work in adding sourced content to this article.

A few things;

First, please use headings for headings; ==first level== ... ===second level=== ... ====third level==== and so on, instead of artificially using bold or other markup elements.

Second, isn't the Huffington Post an online publication only? In which case, do you have a URL (internet link) for the study?

Third, do you have an ISBN for the printed source?

Fourth, is what you have added direct quotes from the sources concerned, or parts of them?

Thanks again. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your feedback, I'm new to editing Wikipedia and greatly appreciate and welcome any help. Yes the ISBN for the printed source is 978-160286-1848 The URL for the study is http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/20/long-term-effects-of-bullying_n_2728190.html Also, what I have added is direct quotes from these sources.

Thanks again for your constructive feedback, I really appreciate the guidance as I learn my way around!4Him88 (talk) 02:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks - please also read WP:COPYPASTE in the light of your answer to the fourth question above. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 05:35, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

References

Interventions section moved from bullying article

The interventions section in the bullying article is moved to below as it is entirely school bullying related--Penbat (talk) 21:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Intervention

Despite the large number of individuals who do not approve of bullying, there are very few who will intervene on behalf of a target. Most people remain bystanders, and may accept the bullying or even support the bully. In 85% of bullying incidents, bystanders are involved in teasing the target or egging on the bully. When the bully encounters no negative response from observers, it encourages continuation of the behavior.

There are many reasons why individuals choose not to intervene. They may be relieved that the target of a normal and generally-present danger is someone else, they may take vicarious satisfaction in the bullying, or they may worry that they risk becoming the next target through intervention. An intuitive understanding that others will be similarly unwilling to assist them if they do become the next target likely strengthens the motivation to remain passive.

Researchers considered the just-world belief theory in order to explore a posited decline in anti-bullying attitudes. "This is the idea that people get what they deserve and deserve what they get". The study determined that children do seek to understand, justify, and rectify the different injustices they come across in everyday life. However, further research is needed to link the two together.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): King2k18.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

School-based intervention

The following has been found to be effective in school-based anti-bullying programs:

• training in emotional control
• peer counseling
• school policy on bullying.

US Federal intervention

In 2010, under the leadership of then Assistant Deputy Secretary Kevin Jennings and Education Secretary Arne Duncan, the U.S. Department of Education held the first "Federal Partners in Bullying Prevention Summit," bringing together over 150 researchers, parents, students and executive leadership from both non-profit and corporate organizations involved in bullying prevention efforts. In October, 2010, the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights released a letter clarifying the overlap between bullying and harassment covered under several Federal Civil Rights Laws that require schools to adequately address the behavior. With increasing public attention in late 2010 and early 2011, President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama hosted the first ever White House Conference on Bullying Prevention on March 10, 2011 to "dispel the myth that bullying is just a harmless rite of passage or an inevitable part of growing up". At that Conference, the U.S. Federal Government's central repository on bullying prevention, StopBullying.gov officially launched. Together with the Departments of Health and Human Services, Justice, Defense, Agriculture, the Interior, as well as the National Council on Disability, the FTC and the White House Initiative on AAPI, which made up the Federal Partners in Bullying Prevention, the Department of Education hosted two additional summits in 2011 and 2012, again bringing together the growing anti-bullying field. In April, 2012, StopBullying.gov was relaunched to include additional information as well as a map tracking state anti-bullying laws. In October, 2012 the Departments of Education and Health and Human Services launched a PSA campaign with the Ad Council and other partners targeted at parents to talk to their kids about being "more than a bystander". After Secretary Jennings left the U.S. Department of Education in July, 2011, many of these efforts were spearheaded by Research and Policy Coordinator for Bullying Prevention Initiatives, Deborah Temkin, who was recognized for her work with a nomination for the Samuel J. Heyman Service to America Medals.

Anti-bullying-program success rates

Results from a Texas anti-bullying program "study" which were reported on by CBS News (Sept 2013) at first seemed to indicate that anti-bullying programs were actually counterproductive. However, these study results were later found to be inconclusive, because the Texas study did not actually compare pre-anti-bullying-program incident rates with post-anti-bullying-program incident rates within the same school districts, in other words: these results may have only highlighted the fact that school districts with pronounced bullying problems tend to be more likely to adopt anti-bullying programs, than school districts without pronounced bullying problems. Other more comprehensive studies which did review these rates within the same anti-bullying-program school districts have indeed found mixed results, with some school districts achieving up to 50% reductions in incident rates, while other districts even experienced slightly increased incident rates. In this study it was found that a higher level of participation by a school's central administration generally resulted in a higher success level for the anti-bullying-program.

Bullying has a big impact on kids at school because it singles them out and makes them feel like an outcast. With the advancement of technology, kids now have to suffer cyberbullying which means kids are getting picked on at school and home. All of this bullying affects children on how to handle and deal with the treatment they are getting from an individual and face suicidal ideation or even homicidal ideation. With the violence that is on the media and video games does not help children as well on how to deal with their emotions or thinking process. According to Tripathy, Maharana, Gochhait (2015) argues, “It is true that, violence in media is rapidly increasing. The average child watches 8,000 televised murders and 100,000 acts of violence before finishing elementary school. That number more than doubles by the time he or she reaches age 18.” With the increase in violence that is on the media, children are becoming more violent and school shootings are something that this world is facing more and more. How can we stop the violence going in the school? Parents need to be more involved with their children and in touch with their kids’ teachers. Schools having more security can help be minimizing who is coming in and out schools. Schools having more support groups for bullying can help kids talk about what is happening and what to do.

References Tripathy, P., Maharana, K., Gochhait, S. (2015). Do Violent Movies Create Violence in Youths? A Study, A Journal of Commerce and Management Thought, 6(3), 427-444. Retrieved from: http://web.a.ebscohost.com.csuglobal.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=16&sid=0c3ebdd4-a15d-40f6-b64b-e626c718ecbb%40sessionmgr4007 Angml (talk) 02:05, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

References

Anti-bullying movement section moved from bullying article

Anti-bullying movement

In the 2000s and 2010s, a cultural movement against bullying gained popularity in the English-speaking world. The first National Bullying Prevention Week was conceived of in Canada in 2000 by Canadian educator and anti-bullying activist Bill Belsey. The charity Act Against Bullying was formed in the UK in 2003. In 2006, National Bullying Prevention Month was declared in the United States. The Suicide of Phoebe Prince in 2010 brought attention to the issue in Massachusetts, and sparked reforms in state education. The It Gets Better Project was started in 2010 to combat gay teen suicides, and Lady Gaga announced the Born This Way Foundation in partnership with Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet & Society in 2011.

A 2012 paper from the Berkman Center, "An Overview of State Anti-Bullying Legislation and Other Related Laws," notes that, as of January 2012, 48 U.S. states had anti-bullying laws, though there is wide variation in their strength and focus. Sixteen states acknowledge that bullies often select their targets based on "creed or religion, disability, gender or sex, nationality or national origin, race, and sexual orientation." Each of the 16 employs a wide array of additional parameters, the paper notes, ranging from age and weight to socioeconomic status. Of the 38 states that have laws encompassing electronic or "cyberbullying" activity, 32 put such offenses under the broader category of bullying and six states define this type of offense separately, the authors report.

References

Of bullying in general section moved from bullying article

Of bullying in general

Bullying consists of three basic types of abuse – emotional, verbal, and physical. It typically involves subtle methods of coercion such as intimidation. Bullying behavior may include name calling, verbal or written abuse, exclusion from activities, exclusion from social situations, physical abuse, or coercion.

According to the U.S. National Center for Education Statistics (2007), approximately 32% of U.S. school children reported being bullied at school; nearly 4% reported being cyber-bullied. The Center suggests (2001) that bullying can be classified into two categories:

1. direct bullying, and
2. indirect bullying (which is also known as social aggression).

Ross states that direct bullying involves a great deal of physical aggression, such as shoving and poking, throwing things, slapping, choking, punching and kicking, beating, stabbing, pulling hair, scratching, biting, scraping, and pinching.

He also suggests that social aggression or indirect bullying is characterized by attempting to socially isolate the target. This isolation is achieved through a wide variety of techniques, including spreading gossip, refusing to socialize with the target, bullying other people who wish to socialize with the target, and criticizing the target's manner of dress and other socially-significant markers (including the target's race, religion, disability, sex, or sexual preference, etc.). Ross outlines an array of nonviolent behavior which can be considered "indirect bullying", at least in some instances, such as name calling, the silent treatment, arguing others into submission, manipulation, gossip/false gossip, lies, rumors/false rumors, staring, giggling, laughing at the target, saying certain words that trigger a reaction from a past event, and mocking. The UK based children's charity, Act Against Bullying, was set up in 2003 to help children who were targets of this type of bullying by researching and publishing coping skills.

It has been noted that there tend to be differences in how bullying manifests itself between the sexes. Males tend to be more likely to be physically aggressive whereas females tend to favour exclusion and mockery, though it has been noticed that females are becoming more physical in their bullying.

Gay and lesbian youth are more likely to report bullying and may suffer more bullying and more negative effects.

Clayton R. Cook and co-authors examined 153 studies from the last 30 years. They found that boys bully more than girls, and bullies and targets both have poor social problem-solving skills. More than anything else, poor academic performance predicts those who will bully.

References

--Penbat (talk) 21:47, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Venues of Bullying

I'm going to add some statistics on where bullying takes place in certain areas of schools compared to others. Also, why some areas of schools are more likely to be hot spots for bullying and why they are hot spots. Gonza319 (talk) 06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Student introduction

hello i am a student that will be spending the next few weeks editing this article for a class assignment if you would like to help please contact me through Wikipedia.Mokeeg (talk) 01:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Added Intervention Section

I added an intervention section and included PBIS and what it is, previously this was a section that was completely missing from this article. This is an important section to add because intervention in school bullying is necessary and used in schools across the US.Mokeeg (talk) 02:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Why is it important? The only citation was to PBIS's own website. If it's important, then PBIS will have been covered in journals and other independent reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 04:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

addition to the prevention category

I entered a prevention and intervention called PBIS in the prevention section. I also defined PBIS using a definition from a journal.Mokeeg (talk) 04:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Removing. Again, NOT a reliable source. This "journal" consists entirely of reprinted dubious blog posts, advertorial, and opinion pieces, which you linked to directly, so making this rather obvious. 86.4.181.122 (talk) 15:47, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

New addition to Bullying in Higher Education.

I am adding a section on HIGHER EDUCATION BULLYING to explain that it does occur in colleges and universities. It is not something that happens just in elementary and high school. I want to give some statistics that have been found in the small amount of college bullying research that has been conducted. I am going to refer to the Tyler Clementi case that gave light to the college bullying.Coffeebeans213 (talk) 01:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Cyberbullying

I would like to change the cyberbully definition to

 Most definitions of cyberbullying come from definitions of school bullying. Thus, this conduct is often described as an intentional aggressive behavior that takes place via new technologies, during which groups or individuals hurt classmates who cannot easily defend themselves. Cyberbullying events can occur via cellphones or computers, by means of text messages, e-mails, online social networks, chatrooms or blogs. (Cheesy pickles 79203 (talk) 01:01, 30 March 2018 (UTC))

References

Preventing bullying

I want to add more information on the prevention section because this section is lacking a lot of information. It is important for educating students on bullying to help prevent bullying from occurring within the schools. I also incorporated the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program because it is so popular yet never mentioned. its goals are included in the article as well.

Higher Education Bullying

There is not enough information on bullying in college, although I feel is important because it is still bullying in an educational environment. I want to add some statistics regarding how low the cyberbullying rates are recorded for bullies and victims in college. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheesy pickles 79203 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Ecological fallacy and school conflict

I know that user:PJ Geest meant well and the correlation between inequality and childhood conflict is intuitive. But the correlation between country-level inequality and the amount of school conflict does not reflect the plain correlation (without causal inference) between individual-level socioeconomic status/inequality and either engaging in bullying or being victimized by bullies (see the entry on the ecological fallacy). Moreover, the graph user:PJ Geest posted concerned variety of conflict situations, and this Wikipedia entry is concerned expressly with school bullying. Iss246 (talk) 16:26, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Ok, Childhood conflict is more broad than school bullying, I understand --PJ Geest (talk) 10:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

There is a second problem as well The ecological correlation does not often reflect the individual-level correlation.Iss246 (talk) 09:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

It is not an individual-level correlation. It is a correlation between the average amount of children conflict on country level and the economic inequality on country level. This is the research: Child wellbeing and income inequality in rich societies: ecological cross sectional study. Furthermore, the same correlation also exists, more specific, for school bullying: Income Inequality and School Bullying: Multilevel Study of Adolescents in 37 Countries. The authors in these articles are aware of the ecological fallacy problem, but still important conclusions can be drawn about school bullying:

Findings suggest that adolescents in areas of wide income inequality—not only those in deprived schools and neighborhoods— should be a focus of antibullying campaigns

--PJ Geest (talk) 16:07, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Of course the correlation is not an individual-level correlation. That is what I have been trying to communicate to you. It is an ecological correlation (nothing to do with what biologists call ecology). An ecological correlation involves the correlation of grand averages. Research in statistics indicates that ecological correlations do not shed light on individual correlations and can be deceptive with regard to what is happening on the individual level. That is one reason why I deleted the graph. The other reason is that the graph lumped together all kinds of conflict. Not just school bullying.Iss246 (talk)

New to editing Wikipedia. Confused about hyperlinks

I'm new to Wikipedia and was wondering if there is a hyperlink for the "National Suicide Prevention Lifeline" in this Wikipedia page? If not I'm confused as to why there is no hyperlink yet.--Common helpfulness (talk) 22:08, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

It doesn't specifically talk about bullying at school

Shouldn't most of what's in this article be deleted since it talks about bullying in general and not specifically about bullying at school? It's a real question, I'm new and I'm trying to understand. Interesting Cause 88 (talk) 21:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To selectively merge Bullying and emotional intelligence into School bullying for context, to improve the target, and to remove a position paper. Klbrain (talk) 18:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

---

Bullying and emotional intelligence appears to be a position paper about teaching emotional intelligence skills to teens to help reduce the incidence of teen bullying.

There is a similar critique on the Talk Page

My suggestion is to summarize the key points from the Interventions section and add to School bullying. Wiki-psyc (talk) 21:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

I agree with User:Wiki-psyc. Iss246 (talk) 01:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

@Iss246 Agree Geysirhead (talk) 16:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Removal of citations banner

I have updated the citations hence the removal of the need for citations banner. TomRichomme (talk) 16:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Fall 2023

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 September 2023 and 11 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yellowpotato12333 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jskalski (talk) 22:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Slideshare as source

Hello, I am starting a discussion of the Slideshare as a source. I looked up "encyclopedic" in help and couldn't find anything. What I did find was this definition of published, "Source material must have been published, the definition of which for the purposes of Wikipedia is made available to the public in some form." The slideshare fits this definition. It also synthesizes other sources as you can see at the end section on sourcing. In addition, the creator Rosetta Lee has expertise and a reputation for knowledge on this topic. Angel94117 (talk) 18:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Iss246 alerting you on the talk I started. Please stop reverting without discussing here. Also last revert you took out the Mean Girls paragraph without explanation. I am happy to revise to meet any editorial issues if necessary, but please let's hash them out here. Angel94117 (talk) 18:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Angel94117, what you added to the school bullying entry does not meet Wikipedia:Notability standards. Someone giving an interesting talk at a school is not sufficiently notable. The text is not for an encyclopedia. The text you added needs to be deleted. If you have a serious book or article by subject area experts, that could work. I am taking the text you wrote down. Iss246 (talk) 23:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

This is not consensus. I asked you to stop reverting like that. Angel94117 (talk) 23:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

I am looking over notability.

Rosetta Lee has been covered in reliable secondary sources including: https://www.mi-reporter.com/news/our-job-is-to-continue-to-learn/ where she is called "a local and national expert in diversity, inclusion and equity." Bullying falls under all three, but the points in the article are specifically around inclusion. In this article, the aspects from the slideshow "DEAR" are also cited.

Her bias training is also mentioned here: https://www.presbyterianmission.org/story/board-approves-plan-for-reimagining-and-rebuilding-the-presbyterian-mission-agency/

She shares her conflict and bullying resources here https://sites.google.com/sgs-wa.org/rosetta-eun-ryong-lee/conflict-and-bullying-resources

Links to more than 1,000 slideshows nationally are here: https://www.slideshare.net/leerosetta/presentations

She is featured on youtube in videos including bottom right: https://www.seattlegirlsschool.org/about/outreach-and-professional-development

And the list here that includes national education conferences as well as other schools: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rosetta+lee

This does pass notability requirements. My concern is that you have consistently reverted my edits for different reasons; first, that it wasn't objective enough and I revised for that; second, that you were suspicious because I added content as a newcomer and I explained I had experience as an IP; now it's notability, which I don't agree with.

Please work to an agreement.

Angel94117 (talk) 02:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

This looks WP:UNDUE to me as well. There is no indication why the Wikipedia article should highlight that particular talk, and the sources cited are self-published. The links you share here are not independent sources discussing the talk in question. I will mention that notability doesn't apply here either way - that guideline is about whether a topic deserves a standalone article, not whether another article should mention a particular talk or not. I'll also note that the onus is on the person seeking inclusion to get consensus support for their addition - Angel94117, you should stop re-adding this until you have that support. MrOllie (talk) 02:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I looked over WP:UNDUE and I think that the alternative aggression bullying methods are important information for the school bullying page. This aspect of girl-on-girl bullying was not understood until pretty recently as this section shows. The details give the user more of a sense of how this alternative aggression happens. As a newcomer, I do not have other relationships with editors to call on to help get consensus and was not aware that the onus was on me. Thanks for clarifying. Also, the national education conference is not self-published neither are the first two links above: one is a newspaper and the second is a story on the Presbyterian Mission site about how Rosetta Lee will do a training. This does speak to notability although I now understand that's not the issue, which makes me concerned again about the changing goal posts. I do appreciate your input. Angel94117 (talk) 03:00, 26 September 2024 (UTC) Angel94117 (talk) 03:00, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

If they are important information it should be easy to find a source that isn't self published to use instead. You have posted a couple of links that are not self-published, sure. But they have no bearing on the content which you are actually adding to the article. If this is the highest quality sources to make these points they apparently aren't important enough for reputable publishers to take notice of. MrOllie (talk) 03:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

I checked her sources and the books aren't available at google books for preview but include Salvaging Sisterhood (2005), the PBS doc A Girl's Life (also not available unless pbs subscriber) and the authors already noted in this section Rosalind Wiseman and Rachel Simmons. The fact that she gave 1500 trainings nationally shows that she's well-regarded. Relational aggression was part of a 2016 thesis and there are 40 references to alternative aggression in Rachel Simmon's "Odd Girl Out" book but there is no easy preview. None of these are as handy or as timely as Rosetta Lee who builds on these works. So reputable publishers have taken note of this, but not in ways that are online citable. Angel94117 (talk) 03:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC) Angel94117 (talk) 03:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

As I said in my comment to you user:Angel94117 when I reverted your addition, you seem like a well-intentioned person. One of your mistakes is to rely on Google to deliver up books to you (especially because Google is likely breaking copyright laws). It is better to go to a university library. Someone giving a talk, no matter how good the talk is, is not worthy of being supporting evidence in an encyclopedia. WP is an encyclopedia. Another thing to consider is that Wiseman and Simons gave 1500 training sessions, indicating that they are a commercial enterprise. One of the rules of WP is that the encyclopedia stays away from promoting commercial products even if the training is effective--we really don't know if the training is effective without the help of an independent evaluator. I add that a thesis from Walden U is not such great support. If the research in the thesis were to get into a reputable social science journal, perhaps you would have something more encyclopedic but I could not guarantee that. I am sorry to give you the bad news. But this kind of reverting goes on every day to well-meaning contributors. Iss246 (talk) 05:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

A few clarifications:

- these were her sources not google books. I did not rely on google books.

- this is not just a talk; this is a published slideshare that has good reputation that is also found in books as was the requirement of @MrOllie

- this is not a commercial product either; this is a published slideshare, it's not promoting a product

- the thesis again was to assuage the concerns of Mr. Ollie. Following his line of thinking, I believe this passed muster

As I said, you seem to change the criteria a lot and that concerns me. This passes WP standards.

Angel94117 (talk) 18:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

No, it does not pass muster. I do not believe it is appropriate to write about this talk on the article, and slideshare is not a good citation for this material. Please stop edit warring to force this in. MrOllie (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

ok Angel94117 (talk) 20:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

References

Institutional prevention (possible source for that section)

Year 2024, October 08; in Finland; 'This is how we fight school bullying in the corridors'. Link,
https://yle.fi/a/74-20114220
. 80.67.37.2 (talk) 12:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Can you translate it? Vacosea (talk) 17:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)