Talk:Sarcophaga crassipalpis

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

I have reviewed the definition of a 'stub' article. I believe I have helped this article exceed the requirements necessary to 'un-stub' this article:

The article is in at least one (and usually only one) arthropod category. This article is of minor to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia. (eg. obscure arthropod species) The article has a decent amount of content, but it may be weak in certain areas (remarks should clarify where). At this point, I don't know how to remove the stub template or else I would do so. I have been making small fixes on the spot. I created the article (not really important relative to it current quality and importance scales.)

bpage (talk) 19:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to disagree @Bfpage. There is a good deal of peer-reviewed literature on this species and the page incorporates little of it. I also don't think we should be too hasty to graduate articles to Start since being a Stub draws attention for other users to put some serious effort in. I also use this as an assignment for my entomology class and the Stub tag is a good indicator of a species that needs work. Kevin Judge 17:09, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]