Talk:Sarah Wilson (journalist)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Sarah Wilson (journalist) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Vaccination comments

While I understand that this received some coverage, I'm finding the vaccination comments a bit undue - do we need to retain the section? She did make the comments, and was at the time clearly uninformed, but she also has been very clear that she fully supports vaccination. I'm a bit concerned that we give so much emphasis to a stupid but brief and uninformed comment made on a morning TV show. - Bilby (talk) 02:27, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm neutral here. Two sources – inclusion and exclusion could both be justified. Perhaps the segment could be trimmed further and reduced to a line in another section? A larger issue is that criticism from dietitians regarding her lack of qualifications has been given a mere half-sentence mention. – Teratix ₵ 08:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The criticism from dietitians seems more significant, and could do with more space. I'll do some reading and try expanding it. - Bilby (talk) 08:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]