Talk:Sara Hughes

Sara Hughes has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 28, 2018. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Sara Hughes appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 September 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that with the USC Trojans, beach volleyball player Sara Hughes won 103 consecutive matches and 2 NCAA Championships?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sara Hughes.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volleyball Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volleyball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Volleyball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolleyballWikipedia:WikiProject VolleyballTemplate:WikiProject VolleyballVolleyball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Volleyball Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's volleyball task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sara Hughes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 15:35, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take up this review, will post comments as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 15:35, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review

Lead

Per WP:REDLINK, a person should only be linked if they are likely to meet notability guidelines. I'm not overly certain what these are for beach volleyball players so, relying on your experience, is Kelly Claes notable?
- There isn't a specific notability guideline for volleyball players, but I do think Claes, who is a member of the US beach volleyball national team and has won a medal on the FIVB World Tour, meets WP:BASIC in terms of coverage from independent sources: [1][2][3][4].

Early life and career

Spell out the abbreviation of MVP in its first use here > most valuable player (MVP).

Y Done.

College

"the 2013–2014 season", in most other sports, seasons are normally displayed as 2013–14. Is there a reason this would be different for volleyball?
"in a three-set lost to a team from the Saint Mary's Gaels", should that be "lost to a team..."?

Y Done.

Amateur career

"with a score of 21-17, 18-21, 15-17", use en-dashes in scorelines rather than hyphens, per WP:DASH.
"Despite the lost", again loss?
"Walkenhorst and Ludwig would go on to win the 2016 Summer Olympics a few weeks later", the link directs to the wrong year here.
Also, win the Olympics is a bit of a loose term. "Win gold at the..." would probably be more suitable.

Y Done.

2017: Partnering with Kelly Claes

"On the AVP", should that be "On the AVP tour"?

Y Done.

External links

Her USC Trojans profile is used as a ref so doesn't need to be listed here as well.

Y Done.

Not too much to worry about, article is very neat and well presented. References are immaculately formatted. Placed on hold for now until these issues addressed. Kosack (talk) 06:20, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kosack: Thanks for the thorough review. I'll address the issues you've brought up asap. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kosack: I've addressed the above issues. Let me know if there are any further concerns/questions. Bennv3771 (talk) 08:39, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have no further concerns with this, I think it comfortably meets the necessary GA criteria. Promoting. Kosack (talk) 09:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]