Talk:Samsung Focus
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Samsung Focus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Samsung Focus be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
[edit]The specs are wrong, this is not a "slider phone".
improper article
[edit]I don't think this article is written in an encyclopedic Fashion and seems to be an advertisement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.217.86.101 (talk) 18:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Possible inappropriate quotation
[edit]The quotation in the review section "Gizmodo stated 'If you're going to get a Windows Phone that isn't the HD7, this is the one to get, thanks to the display, if nothing else.' They also said 'I really can't tell you frantically enough how magically the Super AMOLED screen complements Windows Phone 7's interface. It's like dark chocolate peanut butter cups topped with blowjobs.'" I am not very familiar with Gizmodo, and I wasn't able to find the review (which conveniently was not cited in the article), but I am not sure about the "dark chocolate peanut butter cups topped with blowjobs" part. If it was actually said in a review, it seems rather unencyclopedic to include that quotation, particularly uncited. 99.163.105.163 (talk) 23:09, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Samsung Focus.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Samsung Focus.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC) |
File:ATT i917-Cetus front1 400x400.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:ATT i917-Cetus front1 400x400.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC) |
- Stub-Class Telecommunications articles
- Unknown-importance Telecommunications articles
- Stub-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- Stub-Class Microsoft Windows articles
- Low-importance Microsoft Windows articles
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- WikiProject Microsoft Windows articles
- Stub-Class Brands articles
- Unknown-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles