Talk:Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Z1720 (talk) 22:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: History6042 (talk · contribs) 01:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Z1720 (talk · contribs) 21:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am excited to review this article! Thank you for setting up the review circle for this. As I read the article, I will do some copyediting changes: Feel free to revert any changes I make, but please note it below so that it can be discussed. Please ping me if there are any questions. Z1720 (talk) 21:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for reviewing this and you're welcome for setting up the review circle. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments below:

Should the flag bearers be added to the lead?
I think a summary of the background information should be included in the lead.
"The appearance of Saint Kitts and Nevis at the Tokyo Summer Olympics marked their seventh consecutive summer appearance since it first entered the Games during the 1996 Summer Olympics." Instead, why not talk about the Paris Olympics being the eight consecutive appearance? That seems more relevant to this article.
"Prior to the 2020 Olympics, Saint Kitts and Nevis had not won an Olympic medal." Did Saint Kitts win a medal in the 2020 Olympics? If not, why not rephrase this to be about the 2024 Olympics?
"and the bronze was earned by Fred Kerley of America." Why is America wikilinked to Canada at the Olympics?
"Melissa Jefferson of America." Again, why wikilinked to Canada at the 2020 Olympics?

Those are my comments of the prose. More to come later. Z1720 (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720, Done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources checked with no concerns: 1, 7, 16.

Ref 2: I was unable to verify "Saint Kitts and Nevis received one universality place"
No concerns with the quality of sources.
Earwig did not detect concerns.

I'll put this on hold. Z1720 (talk) 22:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720 For ref 2 it needs to say, "The appearance of Saint Kitts and Nevis at the Paris Summer Olympics marked their eighth consecutive summer appearance since it first entered the Games during the 1996 Summer Olympics. They debuted at the 1996 Olympic Games with 10 athletes, the most they have ever sent to the Games" and nothing about universality places. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: The wikilinks to "Canada at the 2020 Summer Olympics" are still present in the article, as outlined above. Do those need to be fixed? Z1720 (talk) 22:36, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720, I just fixed them. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: This passes the criteria. Congratulations! Z1720 (talk) 22:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.