Talk:Saint Germain Foundation

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

It is not a good idea to merge I AM Foundation with "I AM" Activity. The instructional information is considerably different between the two organizations.

It is neither a good idea to merge the Saint Germain Foundation with the I Am Foundation, as the two organizations are completely unrelated.

I think the sentence saying "The group is recognized by the Theosophical Society and the Great White Brotherhood" should be modified. The Great White Brotherhood is not an organization that has been proven to exist. Even if we believe it does, I think it is still misleading to refer to it in this way as if the recognition (by a society that may not even exist) is an established fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.75.64.144 (talk) 12:35, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]