Talk:Sadko (painting)/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Sadko (painting). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 21:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Sadko by Ilya Repin

... that the future Tsar Alexander III bought a painting of disappointed mermaids (pictured)? Source: The Tretyakov Gallery Magazine ("...the heir to the Russian throne, the future Tsar Alexander III, formally commissioned the work..."); Ilya Repin ("The young women, that are half-human and half-aquatic ... respond to his rejection with sadness or disappointment.")
- ALT1: ... that in his painting Sadko (pictured), Ilya Repin used a subject from Russian folklore to express his experience of living abroad? Source: Sadko - Virtual Russian Museum ("Repin painted the work when he was a fellow of the Imperial Academy of Arts in France. Cut off from his usual environment, the young artist employed the folklore theme to express his mood and state of mind.")
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Plaza Hotel Curaçao

Created by Ffranc (talk). Self-nominated at 10:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The article is new enough, long enough, and well sourced. Both hooks are cited and interesting, with ALT0 being a little whimsical. The painting is in the public domain and looks OK at 100px so no issues there. Since qpq is done and earwig isn't picking up any (non-quoted) copyvio, I'd say this one's ready! BuySomeApples (talk) 01:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)