This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors on January 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
The opening paragraph states that the submarine operated in the Mediterranean Sea in World War I, but further along the article says it also operated in the North Sea in "clean up" (what does that mean?) operations. I believe some re-wording of the first paragraph should be done to not confuse the reader into thinking it served only in the Med. Maybe it could say it operated primarily in the Mediterranean instead? - Itsfullofstars05:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re the caption to the photo, it says it's a picture of the sub in Newport in 1916. Which Newport? The link says the one in Wales. But Britain was at war with Germany, how could it dock in Wales? 71.102.15.95 (talk) 19:34, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, something wasn't right. The Newport link was incorrectly pointing to the Newport, Wales article. The editor meant to refer to Newport, Rhode Island, USA, however even that is suspect. See article SM U-53, which states it was the U-53 that paid a 'courtesy visit' to Newport, Rhode Island in 1916. I've commented out the photo and the caption. The disputed photo might still be of the U-35, but if so the location wasn't "Newport." --Itsfullofstars (talk) 22:36, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The picture used right now clearly is not U-35. U-35 was a Type U-31 ocean-going submarine, while the picture used shows coastal submarines of Type UB-II. Those don't look like Type U-31 submarines at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.189.12.26 (talk) 22:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]