Talk:S. N. Subrahmanyan

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The controversy section has an unfair headline and content

[1]https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/p-chidambaram-writes-nrn-sns-and-other-provocative-people-9786227/

[2]https://www.livemint.com/companies/people/lt-chairman-sn-subrahmanyan-90-hours-workweek-lashings-infoedge-founder-sajeev-bikhchandani-comes-to-defense-business-11736662233672.

html

discussion

Attached sources are many examples (there are more) of prominent people who have come in support of the statement as well. How can users blatantly call it a controversy and say what they want? It has to be a balanced article, a healthy debate. Wikipedia is meant for balanced opinions not for bullying. Requesting users who are against the edit to please be respectful. Warriorsocial1234 (talk) 14:51, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edited version to promote neutrality per wikipedia policy

The current version presents only one side. This revision incorporates both criticism and support from reliable sources, per WP:NPOV. It also ensures the discussion remains fair, focusing on work culture debates rather than solely criticism Warriorsocial1234 (talk) 15:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]