Talk:Royal Typewriter Company
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Tenses of page need to be improved upon
[edit]The tenses of this article need to be improved upon. Talking about things that are in the past although they are in the future is not proper grammar. This would not take long to do and I may come back to it. Perhaps someone who has more of an interest in this subject could take on this project though. David Marshall B.Ed. (talk) 08:02, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Marketingspeak
[edit]"This strategic split was designed to enhance Royal's operational efficiency and better serve diverse markets. Both entities remain committed to delivering the high-quality products and services you have come to expect." That was added by the companies marketing department, wasn't it? I thought they weren't supposed to do that. 82.15.19.183 (talk) 06:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)