Talk:Roy Earl Parrish

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Roy Earl Parrish article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Roy Earl Parrish has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 17, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Baffle gab1978, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on September 8, 2023.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / North America / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	World War I task force

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: State Legislatures / History / West Virginia / West Virginia University Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Mid-importance).
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia University (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Passed. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Roy Earl Parrish/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 21:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. If you have any questions, feel free to ask them here. —Ganesha811 (talk) 21:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Curbon7, we're just about there. Please address the issues below; in general, they're minor and should be quickly fixable. This is a fascinating and well-written article! —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Curbon7, are you available to fix the issues below? —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article now meets the GA standard. Congrats to you and to anyone else who worked on it! —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Unusually, no prose fixes required at all. This is a very well-written piece; kudos to the nominator.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Pass, no issues.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Pass, no issues.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Sources are almost all reliable historic newspaper articles, well-formatted. Note: "was blown to atoms" is something you don't see in headlines anymore! If anything the article is almost too reliant on contemporary newspapers - has Parrish not been mentioned in many books or academic sources since the 1910s? Not really a roadblock to GA, but would be good to have some retrospective perspective. Spot-check of 7 sources (7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49) reveals no issues, no close paraphrasing or copyvio.
	2c. it contains no original research.	No OR detected, pass.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	This sentence is too closely borrowed from source: "Roy Earl Parrish was born on November 24, 1888, in Wallace, West Virginia. He was the third of seven children" - modify to avoid copyvio. Issue addressed. Earwig finds nothing else, but hold for manual spot check given that Earwig can't handle newspapers.com clippings. Spot-check of 7 sources (7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49) reveals no other issues, no close paraphrasing or copyvio. Some appropriate quotes, nothing excessive. Issue addressed, pass.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Cannot find anything else of significance. Pass.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	The March 12 1915 episode is very interesting; perhaps a bit too detailed for my taste, but nothing that would prevent the article getting to GA. However, if you can trim a sentence or three from the paragraphs dealing with the 1915 session, that wouldn't hurt. Also, Goodykoontz is a great name! The quote from his superior while he was liason officer should be shortened. Issues addressed, pass.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Other than the overlong quote mentioned above, no other issues. Conditional pass.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No issues here, pass.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No issues, both public domain.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Two portraits, captions are fine, no problems.
	7. Overall assessment.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.