This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
I believe that having a gigantic list of all of the articles published by Mr. Billinton is a waste of space and a (somewhat) subset of WP:RAWDATA. Why these articles, and why in this order? If anyone can type in "billinton" into a JSTOR/Web of Knowledge search and get them ALL, why include this list? If any of these articles should be included, they should only be the highly-cited ones (say, anything with >300 citations to it). Primefac (talk) 19:55, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My suggestion would be to only list those whose significance is explained in the article text. For the vast majority, a single Google Scholar link to his publications or something like that in the "External links" section will suffice. In short, if the list of "selected" academic papers in the article on a living scientist is longer than that for Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein, you're probably not selective enough. Huon (talk) 20:35, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
