Talk:Route poisoning

Inaccurate

I think this definition is incorrect, or maybe it's just worded imprecisely 67.170.10.23 07:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is some confusion by the original author regarding the difference between route poisoning and poison reverse. 68.85.119.250 22:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(april 5th, 2012) - [Comer,2000] brings up the definition of poison reverse: "Once a connection disappears, the router advertising the connection retains the entry for several update periods, and includes an infinite cost in its broadcasts. " — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.41.4.26 (talk) 17:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing

I assume this is about internet routing, but it's not very clear. Needs revision. --Lendorien (talk) 14:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]