Talk:Rotax 447
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rotax 447 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Rotax 447 be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Errors
[edit]Performance section contains an error, says 37kw (40HP), should be 30kw (40HP), this also affects power/weight ration, says 1.38 but is actually closer to 1.1 which is quite important when dealing with an aircraft engine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.136.150.105 (talk) 09:27, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- You are quite right! Thanks for pointing that out, it has now been fixed. - Ahunt (talk) 11:24, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class aircraft engine articles
- Aircraft engine task force articles
- Aviation articles needing images
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class Austria articles
- Low-importance Austria articles
- All WikiProject Austria pages
- Wikipedia requested images of aircraft engines