Talk:Rose Kerr (Girl Guiding)

Scouting High‑importance

	Scouting portal Rose Kerr (Girl Guiding) is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Girl Guiding and Girl Scouting task force.
	This article was the project's Portal biography of the month (January 2010).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Rose Kerr (Girl Guiding) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

For those working on the article

Note that she might show up as Mrs. Mark Kerr if you are searching for info on her. --Erp (talk) 02:13, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Kerr disambiguation

It seems there is a Rose Kerr who is a current English art historian specializing in Chinese art. Johnbod (talk · contribs) has added a line to the first paragraph of this article stating "She is not to be confused with Dr Rose Kerr, the English art historian specializing in Chinese art", I reverted, he reverted back. My own view is no confusion is likely to arise given that Rose Kerr the Guide probably died before Rose Kerr the historian lived (and the dates are in the first sentence). In fact confusion is likely to arise by people wondering who this other Rose Kerr is being mentioned right at the beginning of this article. Normally one would use a hatnote but the historian does not have a wikipedia page (though one might be created shortly though there is apparently a debate about notability). Once the page is created then a hatnote can be added to this article (or even a disambiguation page if it is determined they are equally notable) but until then I don't think the historian should be mentioned in this article. I think this is related to WP:NOARTICLE; if we don't have an article to redirect to we shouldn't mention that someone of the same name exists and isn't this person unless there is some direct connection (e.g., this Rose Kerr is grandmother of the historian). After all should we also mention Rose Kerr who is director of education in Staten Island or Rose Kerr who is an expert on fish? --Erp (talk) 05:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The art historian is a good deal more notable (these days) than the guider, and is likely to have a page soon. The note at least tells people she doesn't have a page yet. Why not stop trying to whip up a storm in a teacup? Johnbod (talk) 05:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then use a redlinked hatnote even though those are frowned upon unless the article will show up in a day or two; it will save you having to come back to edit this page once the article is created. The current situation will only leave people who come for the Guide leader confused. Remember both are notable in only small areas. --Erp (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with user:Erp, that's what hatnotes are for. If there is no article, write one or there is no issue. Not for lead paragraph.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]