Talk:Ronnie Rocket/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 16:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox: Rather than write a note in the infobox, why not create a notes section, and put the "both attached at different times" note, etc. there. It does kind of make the infobox look messy.
Seems needless complicated, it's just an explanatory aside and the box isn't particularly cluttered. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Overview: "another hallmark Lynch's writings". Huh.
"hallmark of" now. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Overview: "had been" → "were"
Fixed on both instances. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Background: "Lynch" say "David Lynch". It is the first time it was mentioned in the actual article. See WP:MOS.
Got it. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Background: "television series" mystery series?
Don't know if that flows so well; given that everything else is about film I think "television" is necessary here. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
References: Most refs are missing publishers
Got them. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Small, but solid. That's all from me. On hold. TBran dl ey 17:01, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed or replied to everything listed. Now to actually read that bloody script. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I read it. I just didn't find anything issues. Sorry for not clarifying. The article appears good now. Pass. TBran dl ey 00:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I mean I need to read the actual Ronnie Rocket script, I found a copy online but I haven't got round to it yet. GRAPPLE X 00:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. Cool. TBran dl ey 00:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]