Talk:Rolls-Royce RR500

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Recent changes

I have twice reverted uncited additions claiming that certain "new" RR models are in fact "rebadged derivatives" of olde engines. The problem is that these statements are not based on reliable sources that explicitly say thay new engines are just "rebadged derivatives". (Given that the FAA document is from 2000, I was not surprised to find no mention of the RR500 in it.) If RR is falsely presenting older designs as "new" (not just improved derivitives), then that needs to be told. However, making such caims without citing explicit reliable sources that say that is not allowed, and further, could cause WP to be liable for false claims. All of these claims may well be true, but we muct cite reliable sources that actually say those things. - BillCJ (talk) 07:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Factsheet

The current version is here: http://www.rolls-royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/customers/civil-aerospace/rr500-turboprop-tcm92-11545.pdf

It is dated 2009. Certification is 'Expected 2012'. Is this engine going anywhere?

109.145.109.91 (talk) 02:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rolls-Royce RR500. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]