This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Are there any reliable sources that are about about Roger Holzberg in specific? Or is he incidental to all the coverage? czar16:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is a BLP, not an abstract topic. Per WP:NBIO, "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability"; the mentions are not trivial, as they are not merely, for example, inclusions in a list of names. That said, there are some more focused sources that could be added to the article.[1][2]bd2412T17:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Those two sources are a bio (likely created by the individual) and press release—they wouldn't count towards notability by any measure... czar17:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article subject is the writer of an Academy Award-nominated documentary. I'm just not seeing a notability issue here. bd2412T20:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If his role in that documentary was important, where are the sources saying so? That qualification does not warrant an automatic pass of the criteria—what sources discuss the subject in detail? czar20:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would say that the middle section of the New York Times piece, already in the article, provides more than incidental coverage. I have also found Deborah Todd, Game Design: From Blue Sky to Green Light (2007), p. 32-33, 37-39, which gives a fairly lengthy discussion to Holzberg's approach to game design, which was an aspect of his job while heading Imagineering. bd2412T20:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
