Talk:Roger Godsiff

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birmingham Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The neutrality of this article is disputed.

"In November 2019, he was barred from standing as the Labour candidate over his opposition to LGBT+ Inclusive Education in Birmingham schools. Godsiff subsequently declared his intention to stand as an independent candidate due what he called a 'vicious group of LGBT activists' in the Labour Party although some suggest he's not standing down to secure the £22,000 golden handshake defeated MPs are given.[1]"

The description of the reason he was barred, "opposition to LGBT+ Inclusive Education in Birmingham schools", is wrong for two reasons.

Firstly, what was behind the "triggering" of Mr Godsiff was his saying that a certain cause was "just". But the decision of the Labour NEC may well have been based upon other considerations.

Secondly, if the reason for the final decision was the same as the reason for the initial triggering that led to the need for that decision, the description of that reason as "opposition to LGBT+ Inclusive Education in Birmingham schools" is, at best, biased rhetoric rather than a neutral description of the factual background. Moreover, there was only ONE Birmingham school involved, out of 258 primary schools and (presumably) a similar number of secondary schools in Birmingham.

Reference 1 is to a Guardian article that I have criticised myself today, for its omission to report that the issue at stake, distorted as "opposition to LGBT+ Inclusive Education in Birmingham schools", which is actually Mr Godsiff's statement that the cause of what I have called the Anderton Park 3 was "just", is still sub judice. In five days, the court will rule as to whether that cause was and is just, implicitly condoning or condemning the de-selection of Mr Godsiff if the reason for that was his statement that the cause was just.

For this and other reasons, this entry falls far short of the required standard of neutrality. It may well be actionable.

John Allman (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are two schools involved in this and the sentence in question is supported by The Guardian, which we consider a reliable source. If it is actionable, which I very much doubt, it is the editor of The Guardian's concern. Lastly you have a conflict of interest as evidenced by your blog [1]. Graham Beards (talk) 10:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Independent?

"is a British Independent politician"

Is he? This article states that he never lost the Labour whip, and he does not seem to have resigned his party membership. Until he actually puts forward a formal independent candidature (which presumably would incur automatic expulsion from the party) I suggest he is described as "former Labour MP"—"former" because all MPs who sat in the last parliament are now out of office, formally speaking. Harfarhs (talk) 02:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]