Talk:Rocky Fire
Appearance
Rocky Fire has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 3, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rocky Fire/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Penitentes (talk · contribs) 14:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Personisinsterest (talk · contribs) 12:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]I'll review this, and it'll be done by midday. Going to do a spot check. Article looks good.
- I began the spot check, and citation 3 is inaccessible, both in its link and archive link. @Penitentes, do you have a link to the article or other proof that it supports the text?
- Hi! Do you mean the S.F. Chronicle article "Explosive Rocky Fire a warning for drought-parched state"? I am able to access both the original link (without a subscription) and the archive link. Perhaps try this separate archive.is link? — Penitentes (talk) 13:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- This works, thank you. Personisinsterest (talk) 14:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Review
[edit]This article passes the Good Article criteria.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- History good articles
- GA-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/30 March 2024
- Accepted AfC submissions
- GA-Class California articles
- Unknown-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- GA-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- GA-Class Wildfire articles
- Unknown-importance Wildfire articles
- WikiProject Wildfire articles