This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert J. Marks II article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
My so-called bias was to oppose those who sought to make this biographical article into anti-intelligent-design propaganda. At the time, there was evidence only that Marks was a neo-creationist. Ironically, I am here now to point out that SuperScholar.org lists Marks among "The 20 Most Influential Christian Scholars," and describes him as the "Charles Darwin of intelligent design." See http://www.superscholar.org/features/20-most-influential-christian-scholars/.
The introduction presently says, "In 2010, he was named as one of the twenty most brilliant living Christian professors.[6][7]" It is highly inappropriate, in my opinion, to suppress with passive voice the fact that a website named CollegeCrunch.org did the naming. I am editing to indicate that two websites included Marks in "20 Most..." lists in 2010, and to include the "Charles Darwin" bit. ThomHImself (talk) 08:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is no indication that SuperScholar.org or CollegeCrunch.org are WP:RSs. (Most obviously, SuperScholar.org fails WP:RS's requirement of "a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" by attributing to Marks Dembski's infamous Law of Conservation of Information.)
Given that (i) intelligent design has essentially no scientific acceptance & (ii) Marks has very little profile in the ID movement, calling him the "Charles Darwin of intelligent design" is absolutely ludicrous. Even the "20 Most Influential Christian Scholars" would appear to be somewhat of an exaggeration -- as there'd probably be at least 20 still-active Christian Nobel prize winners, to start with.
