Talk:River Eden, Kent

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Surrey Low‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Start‑class Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mills Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Oxted Millers

Burley family - millers in Oxted in the eighteenth century. Mill unknown.(Curious Fox)

Source

According to the Ordnance Survey the source is in ~~Limpsfield~~ Titsey Parish, 51°16′37″N 0°02′12″E / 51.276894°N 0.036654°E / 51.276894; 0.036654, in an unnamed patch of boggy scrub to the north of Clacket Wood. Follow the link and select Ordnance Survey "Get-a-Map" for confirmation. On some larger-scale maps (accessed through the "Magic" link) it's marked as "issue". I propose to change this shortly, subject to other editors' views and suggestions for wording. --Old Moonraker (talk) 22:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Old Moonraker (talk) 12:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Error: the parishes of Limpsfield and Titsey are combined for church purposes but not in the civil adminstration. Thanks to User:Mjroots for noticing this. --Old Moonraker (talk) 13:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Info box

Now that I have repaired the co-ordinates in the info box (which were leading to some open land near Pyry) I have taken them out of the lead paragraph text, to aid readability. However, I acknowledge that this is not consistent with the practice later in the article and will happily reinstate if this is the wish of other editors. I've also removed the perfectly accurate "Tandridge" and "Sevenoaks" from the infobox because it implies a connection with the village and town, respectively, rather than the administrative districts. I have substituted the counties. --Old Moonraker (talk) 13:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haxted mill and map move

It's all in Surrey, quite a way from the border [1]. The boundary is about a mile to the east, on Kent Brook rather than the Eden just here.

On my browser having the map on the left forces the table of contents to the centre, with a huge white space all around it, looking most odd. Would editors consider moving it back please? --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On my browser, having the map on the right creates a large area of blank space to the left of the infobox. Re the border issue, I remember Mr Woodrow explaining that the county border ran through the waterwheel. I've checked my 1903-10 OS map and that shows the border along the Kent Brook. Maybe the border did run through the mill many years back. For the moment, I'll ensure the three articles say Surrey, and if I can find concrete proof of an earlier border, I'll add it in with the reference for the same. Question is, if the mill isn't in Kent, what parish is it in? Mjroots (talk) 14:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the map into the infobox. Looks much better on my browser. Mjroots (talk) 14:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on River Eden, Kent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100418233451/http://www.millsarchive.com/kent/MillPageData/MillsList.aspx?powersource=2 to http://www.millsarchive.com/Kent/MillPageData/MillsList.aspx?powersource=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]