Talk:Rilmazafone

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Rilmazafone.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Recent edits - vandalism?

Hello, it would be great if someone versed in this topic could take a look back through recent edits. Someone(s) has been changing a lot of the terms in this article, without explanation. In particular, any mentions of the drug having a sedative effect have been removed or changed, usually to "allergy reducing." In the July 21 edit, the name of a source has been changed from "profiles of benzodiazepinergic hypnotics", to "profiles of antihistamines."

This is obviously uncool, but I don't know how to unravel it. Anybody? Jessicapierce (talk) 03:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

"Wikipedia does not tell its readers what is or is not important." Yet that is exactly what is does, tell the reader fact from fiction, though, at least 75% of all supposed science in Wikipedia is plain science fiction. Btw, the sentence "Wikipedia does not tell its readers what is or is not important", is informative and repeats an earlier similar statement. U2A02:A453:59CB:0:1454:D15D:2272:E5E1 (talk) 22:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]