Talk:Right circular hollow cylinder

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 September 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Right circular hollow cylinder It is a solid geometrical shape and more important place in mathematics. The chapter of cylinder in solid geometry will be incomplete without Right circular hollow cylinder.Nobody can ignore it.It is a notable artcle.Please keep it.Teacher1943 (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I humbly urge that you consider this article. This particular study is in solid geometry Teacher1943 (talk) 07:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As cube and cuboid are separate articles with minor difference.
As cuboid and parallelepiped are separate article with minor difference.

similarly Cylinder and Right circular hollow cylinder are separate articles with minor difference. Teacher1943 (talk) 11:49, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Topic of article and subject matter is unique and worthy for separate article.Please keep it.Teacher1943 (talk) 12:36, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Nagric (talk) 08:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

As this article is entirely about a trivial use of the formula for a right cylinder, but there is no consensus to delete it, I recommend replacing the content with a redirect to Cylinder (geometry).—Anita5192 (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I support the replacement with a redirect. I do not agree with the comparisons of cube vs. cuboid, or cuboid vs. parallelopiped being similar. Perhaps the number of words in the respective titles can serve as a hint as to why? Truncated pyramid, Oblique cylinder, etc. are also redirects to more fundamental concepts or one-word names. There is as yet not a single WP article that uses the phrase "right circular hollow cylinder". —Quondum 19:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced this article with a redirect for the reasons stated above and because more than a week has passed and no one has objected to the replacement.—Anita5192 (talk) 02:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]