Talk:Richard Li
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]this is definitely incomplete... the scandals are unclear, especially the last point (actually to do with salary, i think) - - and business history very brief
I would like to drop my 2 cents here, even it probably will be erased.
I heard that lots of people including the pensioners lose their life saving by Mr Li's action, that probably is why so many people are so pissed about Mr Li and his family.
But don't you worry man. All human, no matter rich or poor will eventually end up in the same 'place'. I am sure by that time, Mr Li will find himself surrounded by lots of people. Millions of people are going to have fun screwing him and his father.....
Well, until then, see you in that 'place'.
He is a con-man and is hated by Hong Kongers. He can't speak proper Cantonese or English, stutters, has a speech impediment, and no has intellect or academic qualifications. He only got to where he is because he is a son of Li Ka-shing, and uses that relationship to trick the confidence of Hong Kongers. 86.176.190.115 (talk) 02:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Philanthropy
[edit]Saw Richard Li's profile on facesofphilanthropy.com, noticed his Wiki article didn't have a philanthropy section, so I added one. Sir. Somerset (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Richard Li/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I would like to drop my 2 cents here, even it probably will be erased.
I heard that lots of people including pensioners lost their life savings with Mr. Li's action, therefore I can understand why many people are so pissed. But don't you worry. All human, no matter rich or poor will eventually end up in the same 'place'. I am sure by that time, Mr Li will find himself surrounded. Probably lots of people will have lots of fun screwing him and his father... Well, until then, see you in the 'place'. |
Last edited at 13:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 04:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Richard Li. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715183403/http://www.richardli.com/bio.html to http://www.richardli.com/bio.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.nac-cna.ca/en/news/viewnews.cfm?ID=1966
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Richard Li. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628201122/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=21&art_id=108670&sid=31484549&con_type=1&d_str=20110302&fc=2 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=21&art_id=108670&sid=31484549&con_type=1&d_str=20110302&fc=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Richard Li. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130210133123/http://topics.wsj.com/person/l/richard-tk-li/527 to http://topics.wsj.com/person/l/richard-tk-li/527
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110302112127/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-07/14/c_13399632.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-07/14/c_13399632.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nac-cna.ca/en/news/viewnews.cfm?ID=1966
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
College vs. highschool
[edit]Thought it was a bit odd the page said he went to both Menlo School and Menlo College, so I checked, and in 1994 the LA Times says his university was Stanford, while I assume the "prep school in Menlo Park" is Menlo School.
The FT says Stanford too, but also mentions Menlo College (which was at one point associated with Menlo School and may have gotten the FT confused?)98.13.211.156 (talk) 07:13, 4 December 2020 (UTC)