Talk:Rich Cohen

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Biblio section

Have commenced tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates; feel free to continue.Sunwin1960 (talk) 04:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive reviews

The article currently contains an excessive amount of reviews. It lists each publication under its own heading and then provides glowing reviews for each publication. I only see a need for separate sections on each publication when each one is notable by itself (e.g., the Mitch Albom article).

The article ought to describe the sequential release of each publication in narrative form in one section, while having well sourced reviews in a separate Reception section. It's my intention to alter the article along those lines, and would like feedback from local editors prior to making the changes. Thank you! Spintendo 00:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

Tone does not appear "encyclopaedic" and reads like a book agent's copy on an author they represent. Or self-promotion. Needs clean up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.166.185.125 (talk) 08:45, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]