Talk:Repulsion (band)

Untitled

Black metal?

Although Repulsion's crust punk approach is somewhat similar to the punkish approach of a number of minimal black metal bands, I don't think it would be accurate to state that Repulsion had a "significant impact" on the black metal scene.

Fair use rationale for Image:Horrified2.jpg

Image:Horrified2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Horrified.jpg

Image:Horrified.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

On Goregrind it says that this band is Goregrind. I will add Goregrind.--DABANANAMUFFIN (talk) 23:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deathgrind

i replaced Grindcore, death metal with Deathgrind.^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by GREYBOYY (talk • contribs) 17:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Repulsion (band)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Repulsion (band)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "terrorizer":

From Grindcore: "Powerviolence: The Dysfunctional Family of Bllleeeeaaauuurrrgghhh!!". Terrorizer no. 172. July 2008. p. 36-37.
From Hardcore punk: "Powerviolence: The Dysfunctional Family of Bllleeeeaaauuurrrgghhh!!". Terrorizer (172): 36–37. July 2008.
From List of grindcore bands: Schwarz, Paul, "Death Metal|Death/Grind" (2006). Terrorizer #150, p. 54.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Genre discussion

Hello Issan Sumisu,

Obviously, I take issue with your take on this. 🙂 When the author of the article, Andy O'Connor, states, "they were pushing thrash and punk into limits that would become the blueprints for grindcore music" what do you read?

The standard way to read this is, "the band's style was thrash and punk that they then (the word "would" implies "in the future") pushed into something new." This new genre is what is now referred to as grindcore. It seems pretty clear in what he writes. The band also eludes to this in their Voicesfromthedarkside interview that their members were "Thrash", and state how thrash metal bands like Exodus were influences. But I've been reminded that what band members say about themselves genre-wise does not count.

Lastly, their origin was as "a metal act covering Bay Area thrash metal bands, such as Slayer and Metallica."

I feel you are not reading the reference correctly. That said, how about we include the thrash metal genre, but do as I've often seen done, list it as "thrash metal (early)"? – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 20:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

I don't have any problem with its inclusion and I'm definitely aware that many consider their pre-recording music to be thrash, it just that it seems to me like that source is saying their style, which would later be termed grindcore, was an expansion of the sound of thrash and punk. If you'd like to use a source to include this I think that A History of Heavy Metal by Andrew O'Neill would be better as it says "Repulsion began like as a thrash metal cover band called Tempter", however it does also says they "played in a hardcore punk in a hardcore punk style and wrote songs heavily influenced by Slayer". So if thrash were to be included then hardcore would as well, to be neutral. Issan Sumisu (talk) 07:59, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. As you know, it gets so fuzzy when one gets back to the original sound of a band. Glad you found the "A History of Heavy Metal" reference. I think we can agree that they just didn't start out as grindcore from day one, that evolved. So what were they at the start? Thrash – I'm sure (but my opinion don't count 😉), hardcore, yeah, I'd say that too. But I also hate having overfilled genre fields! I did note that a couple years ago you were not happy about using the "early" tag. So, you okay with adding both with cites? I see you feel passionately about genres & willing to go to war for your beliefs (or at least be accüsed of it. 😃)

– ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 08:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

I've always liked early tags as long as their sourced, I'll go ahead and add it though as it seems like we've reached a consensus. 09:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Issan Sumisu (talk)

Awesome, looks good. Thanks. If you're into the band, there's another interview I found, it's linked to at Reference #2 here. Details more of the early times. Regards. – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 10:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

^ Cite error: The named reference terrorizer was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[terrorizer-1] Cite error: The named reference terrorizer was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]