Talk:Relational grammar
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Relational grammar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Keep apart. Relational grammar was a very different framework, primarily attempting to deal with passivization through chômage. It is quite different from the umbrella of transformational grammar. mitcho/芳貴 (talk) 13:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- yes, there is no way these are same type of syntactic analysis. i'll remove the merger note now. – ishwar (speak) 19:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
status in the history of the study of syntax
[edit]Article should mention that while RG influenced some subsequent theories, there are probably very few linguists currently working who call what they do "RG"... AnonMoos (talk) 06:19, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Still a stub?
[edit]I've tried to flesh out this article a bit, with some sources available to me. Is it still a stub, or can I remove the stub header? And if it is, could anyone please recommend additional sources that I could use to flesh it out further? Thanks! --ZeegoTheDeer (talk) 04:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)