Talk:Reichenberg Fellowship

Isolated opinion of this community

This community has an isolated oppinion over homosexuality in Germany and differs from the official positions of the EKD, which accepts homosexual partnerships and wrote the EKD document Verantwortung und Verlässlichkeit stärken. Also the German executvie under chanecellor Angela Merkel wrote 2008, that homosexualty doesn't need any therapy and that there is no therapy to change homosexuality (German Bundestag:Antihomosexuelle Seminare und pseudowissenschaftliche Therapieangebote religiöser Fundamentalisten (German)) GLGermann (talk) 19:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This fellows are barely known in germany let alone the outside world, I guess we really have to consider if this article really is neccessary here, they dont even publish in english and their contacts to other organisations outside germany are questioned at the discussions site for the german article. But i might be wrong. Just share your opinions with me on this issue --Shivago12 (talk) 12:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This fellows are well kown in Germany and abroad. The Reichenberg Fellowship has published several books and a couple of their members are so importand that they have own wikipedia articles. Also their opinion on homosexuality is not isolated - it is the same opinion the Catholic church has. But GLGermann is isolated - he is banned from German wikipedia because of his constant bias. We shouldn't give him much room here. --Schloß (talk) 14:53, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added the relevant information to the top of the page, where it belongs, they are obscure in a way, but they are perhaps most well known for their abusive behavior towards children and continued support of a practice that is scientifically proven to cause trauma; namely, conversion therapy. I will ask for moderation if someone alters talonx89.14.173.216 (talk) 18:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

incoherent?

Benjamin von Gherkin tagged this article as incoherent but failed to write down, which elements confuse him. So either he adds a reason for this tag or I will remove it. --Schloß (talk) 14:53, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did some improvements. The tag is not needed anymore. --Schloß (talk) 15:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]