Jump to content

Talk:Regional Science High School Union

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I'm not sure about the formatting of this article. In line with similar lists it should be cut down (no frame around images, smaller table cells etc.) Just ideas! --Errant Tmorton166(Talk)(Review me) 09:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As regards to the validity of some parts of the article.

[edit]

I am a graduate of one of the RSHS listed in the article that is RTPM-DSHS, RSHS for Region VII. What is questionable is that most of what the curriculum mentions as covered in the instruction isn't actually in fact taught. Perhaps in the plans and program structure, these are inputs, but say for example, the choice to select a chosen major has never been implemented in our entire school's existence of around 16-17 years!!!

Perhaps in other closely regulated RSHS this may in fact be implemented, but to my knowledge this does not apply to our school. I will attempt to list down these inconsistencies in my next post. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sabbathunlimited (talkcontribs) 09:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

who edited this??????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.127.48.169 (talk) 04:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Errors

[edit]

i'm an RSHS-I graduate and i observed that there were some quite erronous entries in this page.

1)Curricullum

2)NAT top 10 placing University of Assumption of san fernando city on top place.i don't even know if that school really exists. and would just like to reiterate that NAT is implemeted by dep ed only for PUBLIC SCHOOLS! therefore how could there be a private school on the top spot. that's so ridiculous. i don't know the purpose of the person of edited it maybe just to give confusion to wikipedia readers. "HOY! kung sino man yun MAHIYA ka sa Sarili MO!". i've already edited this entry and replace it with a factual entry which is Lope De Vega NHS.

Let me remind to all people who are editing articles here in wikipedia to please just enter informations which are FACTUAL. this is an online encyclopedia and it should give TRUE and CREDIBLE informations to it's users.

with this i want to request the administrators of wikipedia to please be more stricter with regards to editing pages.

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.alumni.net/Asia/Philippines/Zambales/Olongapo_City/Regional_Science_High_School/
    Triggered by \balumni.net\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:15, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Regional Science High School Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]