Talk:Reepham, Norfolk

East Anglia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Old Talk Page

1.@ 17:24, 4 May 2006, Reverie Says: Great, someone's started an article on good ol' Reepham; I hearby call upon all Reephamites to strive to better this article until it is a magnificant piece of informative text, worthy of a place on the 'ledgy' website that is known as Wikipedia.

2. @14:35, 14 May 2006, 172.214.133.215 Says: how about a section on the most promenant shops in reepham? i.e. Spar, Post Office, Dianes Pantry, V's Cafe etc..

and also a section on the church detailing how the outside is occupied by wasters every friday night?

just tossing around ideas...

3. @17:32, 2 June 2006,172.213.240.12 Says: as far as the school is concerned the Reepham wiki should not be used as a bulletin board to note down any events which occur at the school... if you think how much happens in one year, if these were constantly documented the wiki would become cluttered.

4. @11:58, 10 June 2006,Reverie Says: Sorry about the delay in replying...

(In reply to comment #2) Yep, those all sound like good ideas. I'll do some research and see what I can add. To be honest, I don't live in Reepham personally so don't know all the details, feel free to add yourself :-).

(In reply to comment #3) You make a fair point. The refference to the art exhibition was basically just a bit of cheap advertising. As the event has now finished, I'll try and change the sentence to have a more passive descriptive tone, to try and keep it from becoming 'a bulletin board'.

New Talk Page

Thanks for the recent revamp people. I'd been adding a lot to it, but hadn't really had a chance to go back and remove repetition and improve comprehension.

Kudos to User:ej159 and User:kevis.

I've created this new talk page as the last one (see above) was a bit poorly structured. I'm going to start a list of the some of the things we need to find out to improve the article.

Improvements List

* Statistics particularly population. Sorted - 2001 stats --Reverieuk 20:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More notable alumini
More notable residents

Reverieuk 22:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've tidied up a little. Reepham is a Norfolk Town not a Village. Just chucked spaces in where they're due etc.

--Ej159 11:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self, include this link soon : http://new.edp24.co.uk/search/story.aspx?brand=EDPOnline&category=News&itemid=NOED27%20Jan%202007%2012:09:23:140&tBrand=EDPOnline&tCategory=search

Reverieuk 23:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i was looking for information on how to get to kerrys pine from norwich via bus or train, this site shows there is a bus to reepham but how far is it away from kerrys pine? There should be a map of the location. please help —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.249.255 (talk) 21:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni

Are the Notable alumni *really* that notable? If they had articales in their own right they'd likely be up for speedy deletion. 164.36.142.217 11:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Criticisms

Kerry's Pine ?

For goodness sake, read what wikipedia is not. It's not an advertising hoarding (and it's not a memorial either). This whole article is lacking the quality required by Wikipedia (and deserved by Reepham, I might add) Ghughesarch 19:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible Article

Please tidy this up and remove the lame references to Kerry's Pine and the efficacy of the local Radio's advertising! --20.133.0.14 15:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To the above posters, I have begun to edit the piece in question. However, I would like to point out, it is not wikipediac to refer to the article as 'Terrible' and yet do nothing to improve it yourself. It is offensive to those who have put hard work into the article, and if you're not happy, you have the 'edit' button too.

Thanks. --Reverieuk 20:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Reepham, Norfolk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170211032229/http://www.norfolk.gov.uk/consumption/groups/public/documents/general_resources/ncc017867.xls to http://www.norfolk.gov.uk/consumption/groups/public/documents/general_resources/ncc017867.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]