Talk:Real Littles Shopkins

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Real Littles Shopkins article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Real Littles Shopkins is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Toys

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neutral Point of View

Does this line show neutral point of view? "These little stubs can be very addicting. So, it is only a matter of time before they invade your own home!" Sorry, i'm new and didn't want to delete the line without asking. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.186.109 (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why also American English?

This is because despite the toys made in Australia, the official packaging for Shopkins uses American English, and in official media, the animation/commercials are created in Australia, but also with production companies in the United States. For proof, all three movies in the franchise use American voice actors and have production companies from the United States (Universal) to help with Moose. Their spin-off web series, Kindi Kids, is the same too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.250.228 (talk) 14:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are two problems with this. The first is that an article cannot be written in two different styles of English. Per MOS:ENGVAR, articles which do not have an obvious link to a single variety of English should retain whatever variety they were initially written in.

The second problem is we don't know for sure that all of Shopkins products use American English. Often, products will have different packaging for different markets. I found a a Canadian press release for a Shopkins product which uses Canadian English. Any claims of how official packaging and media describe a product will need reliable sources. Looking at press releases, commercials, etc. and coming to a conclusion about ALL official packaging and media would be original research. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 04:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]