Talk:Re-Imagining

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://re-imaginingcommunity.org/about-us/history/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 January 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Imagining (Christian feminist conference) → Re-Imagining – No need for disambiguation. 142.161.81.20 (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Simplexity22 (talk) 02:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This one seems discussable. Re-imagining may have several meanings. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC) (comment copied from WP:RM/TR. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC))[reply]
Oppose Per WP:ASTONISH. Re-Imagining should redirect to the same place Reimagining does, or at least be a disambiguation page._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:36, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zxcvbnm: Certainly Re-imagining should redirect to the same place as Reimagining, but the same thing does not apply to Re-Imagining (note the capitalization). WP:DIFFCAPS is clear on this point: "When [hatnotes] are in place, small details [and a difference in capitalization is provided as an example of such a detail] are usually sufficient to distinguish topics". WP:ASTONISH, however, is neither a naming convention nor is it our policy on article titles. 142.161.81.20 (talk) 01:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of course WP:ASTONISH fits this nom and is a perfectly good reason to be used on the renaming of article titles. Someone looking for a popular type of film remake will be "astonished" (or WP:FLABBERGASTED) to find themselves at a page for a one-time conference from the early 1990s. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, you're not making an argument with any basis in our policies and guidelines, despite the fact that our article titles policy takes a clear position on cases such as this in WP:SMALLDETAILS. Surely you wouldn't suggest that we disregard a central consensus on the matter. 142.161.81.20 (talk) 19:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ Support because I wouldn't want to see a long hatnote on the Remake page, so put a hatnote to Remake on this good faith nom per Zxcvbnm. The upper-case "I" is too slight of a difference to take the primary from a common, and becoming more popular, use of the descriptor. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Randy Kryn: The upper-case "I" is too slight of a difference. How do you reconcile that position with the policy WP:SMALLDETAILS which is explicit in saying that a difference in capitalization is not too slight of a difference? 142.161.81.20 (talk) 23:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hoping to make my position a little clearer, and my apologies for not fully explaining it. "Re-Imagining" seems to me to be a styling variant for the new and culturally popular nickname for Remake. Students and other readers who seek a historically accurate encyclopedic article about the combined actions, skills, and creative process and output of writers, director, actors, and the rest of a production crew as they remake a film, might type in "Re-Imagining". Which would, in a re-imagined world, redirect to Remake. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I understood what you meant already, Randy Kryn. But that which you are describing as a "slight … difference" and a "styling variant" – the difference in capitalization – is specifically listed as an example of a "small detail" as defined by WP:SMALLDETAILS. Given that we cannot override the central consensus on the matter barring exceptional circumstances (see WP:CONLEVEL), what I was asking is: how does your argument comport with WP:SMALLDETAILS? 142.161.81.20 (talk) 04:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, I'll change my "vote" because I wouldn't want to see a long hatnote on the Remake page to a one-time conference in the 1990s. Not because of small details, which, in this case, are not relevant for a common name to be primaried to this minor page (but it does sound like a fun conference to have attended). Please assure a proper hatnote is present on this page directing readers to Remake. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not because of small details, which, in this case, are not relevant for a common name to be primaried to this minor page. What provision of WP:AT suggests that WP:SMALLDETAILS is not relevant here? 142.161.81.20 (talk) 19:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Quintessential application of WP:SMALLDETAILS. Anyone searching with this specific term (given the dash and caps), or linking to it, is surely intending to match the topic of this article. --В²C ☎ —Preceding undated comment added 00:32, 10 January 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.