Talk:Railroad Gazette

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Railroad Gazette article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Railroad Gazette has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 21, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Railroad Gazette appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in an 1884 edition of the Railroad Gazette, railroad engineer Horatio Allen reported that he was the operator of the first locomotive run on a railroad in the United States?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Railroad Gazette.

Wikipedia

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Civil engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 19, 2016

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"The"

"also referred to as The Railroad Gazette"—this is a poor use of sourcing. The sources cited don't say that the journal was referred to as The Railroad Gazette, they refer to it as The Railroad Gazette. These are obvious inconsequential errors that don't need to be drawn attention to. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 23:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the publication referred to itself as Railroad Gazette, (see File:Railroad Gazette cover 1904.png) while others included the prefix "The". I feel that is is more factually accurate to include this, rather than omit it. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:37, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you understand what I wrote. The name of the publication is Railroad Gazette, and the fact that other publications mistakenly refer to it in passing as The Railroad Gazette is (a) irrelevant (b) not what the sources say. This is not how sourcing works. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 00:41, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Railroad Gazette/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 12:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 12:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead:

I don't think we need citations in the lead unless we are making controversial claims.

I have copy edited the article to address this matter. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was established and first published in April 1856 I feel it would be better to add this fact to the first line, the period of its run looks significant enough to deserve a mention there.

Done. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content:

We should start with the introductory facts as in the lead.

I have copy edited the article to address this matter. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should add something on what this journal used to report in the lead.

Done. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another publication of the same name Railroad Gazette... I think this should go somewhere in the main text.

This may actually be best left in the lead. For example, if people go to the article looking for information about the other publication that was established in Rogersville, Tennessee, they will immediately be able to see that this article is about a different topic. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rest looks good. Just ensure that the article has been expanded as far as possible. Cheers! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 12:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the changes. I feel this article is ready for promotion. Great job! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 07:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]