Talk:Racism in South America
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Racism in South America article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Racism in South America be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in South America may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 February 2022 and 23 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ltm05.
Unexplained removal of sourced content
[edit]There has been spate of rollbacks by [[User:RichardWeiss]] to the articles Cuban Americans, Dominican Americans, Puerto Ricans in the United States, Brazilian Americans, Chilean Americans, Colombian Americans, Venezuelan Americans, White Hispanic and Latino Americans, Brown (racial classification), Race and ethnicity in Colombia, Discrimination based on skin color, Coloniality of power, Colonial mentality, Racial hierarchy, Racism in South America, and Hispanic and Latino Americans.
These have been undone, since:
- the editor failed to provide any rationale
- the editor deleted sourced content
If you wish to engage in constructive behavior (e.g. questioning the validity of sources), a good place to start would be on the talk pages of the respective articles. Resorting to random drive-by reverts is generally considered unhelpful. Thanks.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.252.4.106 (talk) 11:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- The same highly controversial paragraph has been spammed into 16 different articles. I don't consider the encyclopedia.com source reliable, the article dabs are very poor and the whole paragraph bordering on racist. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 15:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)