Jump to content

Talk:Racing Homer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redirect needed

[edit]

I have noticed that a page with a similar name to this one (Racing pigeon) redirects to Homing pigeon. My problem with that is that although all Racing Pigeons are of necessity "homing" pigeons. Not all homing pigeons are racing pigeons. So I feel that eventually the two pages will run as two different topics. I'd prefer to change the redirect so people searching for Racing pigeons are directed here. I could have just gone ahead and done the redirect but thought I should post here first for comments? Also, this page if it is going to be anything like a proper Encyclopedic reference for racing homers needs plenty more work being done to it. Any takers? Sting au 11:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the redirect. Two months without any objections seemed to say that no one had any problems with a redirect? Sting au 05:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article move

[edit]

Why is this article named "Racing Homer"? In order to conform to Wikpedia article naming convention, should it not be named "Racing homer"? —QuicksilverT @ 23:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Merge

[edit]

I am proposing a merge of this artice with the article named Homing pigeon. Since there are numerous "homing pigeon" type birds, with little or no difference in actual breeding or information. I suggest that all homing and racing pigeon articles are merged, while the main article would state the different names and characteristics of the different 'varieties' of this breed. Show type homers would still be kept separate. If anyone has any opinions, I would love to hear them. Otherwise I will be merging the pages within the week. payxystaxna (talk) 15:55, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Racing Homer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]